Key result
Neither exercise therapy nor cognitive behavioral therapy reduced severe fatigue compared to usual care in patients with postpolio syndrome (mean difference in fatigue score 1.47 and 1.87, respectively).
Why the study?
Does exercise therapy or cognitive behavioral therapy reduce fatigue in severely fatigued patients with postpolio syndrome?
RCT (n=68)
Single-blind
Stratified by center, computer generated, random blocks of 3 and 6
Yes
Does exercise therapy or cognitive behavioral therapy reduce fatigue in severely fatigued patients with postpolio syndrome?
Mean Difference: 1.47 (95% CI -2.84–5.79)
Neither exercise therapy nor cognitive behavioral therapy is superior to usual care in reducing severe fatigue in patients with postpolio syndrome.
Usual care remains appropriate for severe fatigue in postpolio syndrome; challenges efficacy assumptions and warrants trials of alternative interventions.
BACKGROUND: People with postpolio syndrome (PPS) commonly experience severe fatigue that persists over time and negatively affects functioning and health-related quality of life (HRQoL). OBJECTIVES: To study the efficacy of exercise therapy (ET) and cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) on reducing fatigue and improving activities and HRQoL in patients with PPS. METHODS: We conducted a multicenter, single-blinded, randomized controlled trial. Over 4 months, severely fatigued patients with PPS received ET, CBT, or usual care (UC). The primary end point (fatigue) was assessed using the subscale fatigue severity of the Checklist Individual Strength (CIS20-F). Secondary end points included activities and HRQoL, which were assessed with the Sickness Impact Profile and the 36-Item Short-Form, respectively. End points were measured at baseline and at 4, 7, and 10 months. RESULTS: A total of 68 patients were randomized. No differences were observed between the intervention groups and UC group for fatigue (mean differences in CIS20-F score = 1.47, 95%CI = -2.84 to 5.79, for ET versus UC; and 1.87, 95%CI = -2.24 to 5.98, for CBT versus UC), activities, or HRQoL. CONCLUSIONS: Our results demonstrate that neither ET nor CBT were superior to UC in reducing fatigue in severely fatigued PPS patients. Further research should investigate explanations for the lack of efficacy of these 2 currently advised approaches in clinical practice, which may provide clues to improving treatment aimed at reducing fatigue in PPS.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Koopman et al. (2015) conducted an RCT in Postpolio syndrome (PPS) with severe fatigue (n=68). Exercise therapy (ET) or Cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) vs. Usual care (UC) was evaluated on Fatigue assessed using the subscale fatigue severity of the Checklist Individual Strength (CIS20-F) (MD 1.47, 95% CI -2.84 to 5.79). Neither exercise therapy nor cognitive behavioral therapy reduced severe fatigue compared to usual care in patients with postpolio syndrome (mean difference in fatigue score 1.47 and 1.87, respectively).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: