Key result
Implementation of a heart failure disease management program in Georgia increased β-blocker prescriptions from 7.4% to 80.7% (P<0.001) and reduced emergency department visits and hospitalizations.
Why the study?
Does a heart failure disease management program improve medication use and clinical outcomes in patients with ejection fraction ≤40% in a low- and middle-income country?
Observational (n=400)
Does a heart failure disease management program improve medication use and clinical outcomes in patients with ejection fraction ≤40% in a low- and middle-income country?
Implementing a Western heart failure disease management program in a low- and middle-income country is feasible and significantly increases the use of guideline-directed medical therapies.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Supports HF disease management programs in LMICs; extends evidence on GDMT uptake but leaves causal benefits open pending RCTs.
BACKGROUND: Little is known about the importation of a heart failure disease management program (HFDMP) into low- and middle-income countries. We examined the feasibility of importing a HFDMP into the country of Georgia, located in the Caucuses. METHODS AND RESULTS: Patients with ejection fraction ≤40% were enrolled into a prospective, observational study consisting of a new HFDMP staffed by local cardiologists. Medications, emergency department use, hospital admissions, and mortality were assessed by interviews with patients or their families. Screening resulted in 400 patients who were followed for 10.2±3.5 months. β-Blocker prescriptions increased from 7.4-80.7% (P<0.001), angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor prescriptions increased from 18.4-92.6% (P<0.001), and mean systolic blood pressure declined from 145 to 114 mm Hg (P<0.001). Patients visiting the emergency department and hospitalizations were lowered by 40.7% and 52.5%, respectively, but were also influenced by the outbreak of war, during which 17.5% (n=70) of patients received follow-up in refugee tents. All-cause mortality extended to 7% of patients, with 12 of 28 deaths caused by war-related events. CONCLUSIONS: Importation of a Western HFDMP was demonstrated to be feasible, with a 5-fold increase in the use of recommended therapies, reduction of blood pressure, decrease of emergency department visits, and hospitalizations for heart failure. These measures could result in substantial cost savings in resource-limited settings, but assessment is complicated in unstable areas. Translating effective interventions to low- and middle-income countries requires sensitivity to regional cultures and flexibility to adapt both clinical goals and strategies to unexpected conditions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hebert et al. (2011) conducted an observational in Heart failure (n=400). Heart failure disease management program (HFDMP) vs. Pre-intervention baseline was evaluated on β-Blocker prescriptions (p=<0.001). Implementation of a heart failure disease management program in Georgia increased β-blocker prescriptions from 7.4% to 80.7% (P<0.001) and reduced emergency department visits and hospitalizations.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: