Key result
This study is a protocol for an ongoing cluster randomized controlled trial evaluating whether graduated compression stockings are superior to no stockings for preventing VTE in low-risk surgical patients.
Why the study?
Many patients undergoing short-stay surgery at low risk of VTE receive graduated compression stockings, but evidence supporting this practice is poor.
Do graduated compression stockings prevent symptomatic VTE in adult patients undergoing short-stay surgical procedures at low risk of VTE?
RCT (n=21,472)
Cluster randomized
Yes
Do graduated compression stockings prevent symptomatic VTE in adult patients undergoing short-stay surgical procedures at low risk of VTE?
This trial protocol outlines a large cluster-randomized study to determine if graduated compression stockings prevent VTE in low-risk, short-stay surgical patients.
May support omitting GCS in low-risk short-stay surgery; provides first RCT data to guide prophylaxis.
INTRODUCTION: Hospital-acquired thrombosis (HAT) is defined as any venous thromboembolism (VTE)-related event during a hospital admission or occurring up to 90 days post discharge, and is associated with significant morbidity, mortality and healthcare-associated costs. Although surgery is an established risk factor for VTE, operations with a short hospital stay (<48 hours) and that permit early ambulation are associated with a low risk of VTE. Many patients undergoing short-stay surgical procedures and who are at low risk of VTE are treated with graduated compression stockings (GCS). However, evidence for the use of GCS in VTE prevention for this cohort is poor. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: A multicentre, cluster randomised controlled trial which aims to determine whether GCS are superior in comparison to no GCS in the prevention of VTE for surgical patients undergoing short-stay procedures assessed to be at low risk of VTE. A total of 50 sites (21 472 participants) will be randomised to either intervention (GCS) or control (no GCS). Adult participants (18-59 years) who undergo short-stay surgical procedures and are assessed as low risk of VTE will be included in the study. Participants will provide consent to be contacted for follow-up at 7-days and 90-days postsurgical procedure. The primary outcome is the rate of symptomatic VTE, that is, deep vein thrombosis or pulmonary embolism during admission or within 90 days. Secondary outcomes include healthcare costs and changes in quality of life. The main analysis will be according to the intention-to-treat principle and will compare the rates of VTE at 90 days, measured at an individual level, using hierarchical (multilevel) logistic regression. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval was granted by the Camden and Kings Cross Research Ethics Committee (22/LO/0390). Findings will be published in a peer-reviewed journal and presented at national and international conferences. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN13908683.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Machin et al. (2023) conducted an RCT in Hospital-associated venous thromboembolism (n=21,472). Graduated compression stockings vs. No graduated compression stockings was evaluated on Rate of symptomatic VTE (deep vein thrombosis or pulmonary embolism) during admission or within 90 days. This study is a protocol for an ongoing cluster randomized controlled trial evaluating whether graduated compression stockings are superior to no stockings for preventing VTE in low-risk surgical patients.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: