Key result
A clinical audit decreased the prevalence of hypertension in hemodialysis patients from 58.7% at the time of the audit to 47.6% at 6 months post-audit (p<0.05).
Why the study?
Does a clinical audit improve blood pressure control in adult hemodialysis patients?
Observational (n=177)
Yes
Does a clinical audit improve blood pressure control in adult hemodialysis patients?
Absolute Event Rate: 47.6% vs 58.7%
p-value: p=<0.05
A clinical audit with individualized strategies significantly improved blood pressure control and reduced antihypertensive medication burden in hemodialysis patients.
Audit may aid hypertension control in hemodialysis; hypothesis-generating without randomized confirmation.
BACKGROUND: In patients on hemodialysis (HD), hypertension is a risk factor for cardiovascular disease. In this study we tested the effectiveness of a clinical audit in improving blood pressure (BP) control in HD patients. METHODS: 177 adult, prevalent patients undergoing dialysis in NephroCare centers in Italy were audited. At the conclusion of the audit, individual strategies were developed in order to improve BP control. Patient data was collected and examined at months -1 (Pre), 0 (the date of the audit- Audit), and +1 and +6 after the audit (Post-1 and Post-6, respectively). We recorded BP, information on factors affecting BP, and anti-hypertensive drug regimen. The primary outcome of the study was to decrease prevalence of hypertension (BP ≥ 140/90 mmHg). Secondary outcomes were a reduction in average BP in hypertensive patients and/or a decrease in drug delivery associated with lower or unchanged BP. RESULTS: 104 patients out of 177 (58.7%) were hypertensive at Audit. BP levels were directly related to comorbidity and male sex, and inversely related to dialysate sodium concentration. The announcement of the audit alone was associated with a decreased prevalence of hypertension (Pre 64.4% to Audit 58.7%); a further decrease followed the audit (Post-1 51.1%, Post-6 47.6%, p<0.05 vs. Audit). Systolic BP in hypertensive patients also decreased (mean decrease was -8.5 and -14.1; p = 0.007 and p<0.001 at Post-1 and Post-6). Number of drugs assumed was significantly lower at Post-1 and Post-6 vs. Audit (p = 0.005 and p<0.001, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: A clinical audit is an effective tool to improve BP control in HD patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Esposito et al. (2013) conducted an observational in Hypertension in hemodialysis patients (n=177). Clinical audit vs. Pre-audit baseline was evaluated on Prevalence of hypertension (BP ≥ 140/90 mmHg) (p=<0.05). A clinical audit decreased the prevalence of hypertension in hemodialysis patients from 58.7% at the time of the audit to 47.6% at 6 months post-audit (p<0.05).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: