Key result
Adults with congenital heart disease had similar carotid intima-media thickness compared to healthy controls (0.538 vs 0.541 mm; P=0.649), though patients with coarctation had higher values.
Why the study?
With increasing numbers of patients with congenital heart disease surviving into adulthood, identifying diagnostic subgroups of adults with congenital heart disease with increased carotid intima-media thickness was needed for early diagnosis and prevention of acquired cardiovascular disease.
Is carotid intima-media thickness increased in adults with congenital heart disease compared to healthy controls?
Cross-Sectional (n=1,022)
Is carotid intima-media thickness increased in adults with congenital heart disease compared to healthy controls?
Adults with congenital heart disease do not have increased carotid intima-media thickness overall compared to healthy controls, except for those with a history of aortic coarctation.
Similar carotid intima-media thickness overall does not support routine vascular screening in congenital heart disease; leaves open coarctation-specific assessment.
Background Because of the increasing numbers of congenital patients surviving into adulthood, early diagnosis and prevention of acquired cardiovascular disease is reasonable. The aim of this study was to detect diagnostic subgroups of adults with congenital heart disease (ACHD) that have increased carotid intima‐media thickness ( cIMT ), a subclinical marker of cardiovascular damage. Methods and Results This study enrolled 831 ACHD patients (392 women, aged 38.8±11.7 years) from May 2015 to February 2019 at their regular outpatient visit. Far wall cIMT was measured using a semiautomatic ultrasound system at 4 angles. Age, sex, height, weight, blood pressure, smoking status, and antihypertensive medication were registered and entered in a multiple linear regression model to compare diagnostic subgroups to 191 healthy controls (111 women, aged 36.7±13.5 years). There were no significant differences in cIMT of ACHD (0.538±0.086 mm) compared with healthy controls (0.541±0.083 mm; P =0.649) after adjusting for the aforementioned covariates. Only patients with coarctation of the aorta showed significantly higher cIMT values (0.592±0.075 mm; P <0.001) compared with healthy controls. In addition, ACHD patients who were men ( P =0.032), older ( P <0.001), and were prescribed antihypertensive medications ( P =0.003) were all found to have thicker cIMT values. Conclusions Overall, we determined that within the ACHD cohort, only those patients with a history of coarctation have higher cIMT values. To better determine the mechanism of abnormal vasculature, further basic research is needed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Reiner et al. (2020) conducted a cross-sectional in Congenital heart disease (n=1,022). Congenital heart disease vs. Healthy controls was evaluated on Carotid intima-media thickness (cIMT) (p=0.649). Adults with congenital heart disease had similar carotid intima-media thickness compared to healthy controls (0.538 vs 0.541 mm; P=0.649), though patients with coarctation had higher values.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: