Key result
Analytic and numerical simulations of pulsatile biviscous fluid flow demonstrated the effects of Reynolds number and viscosity on pressure drop and wall shear stress in small blood vessels.
Why the study?
The study was conducted to determine blood flow characteristics, pressure drop, and wall shear stress in small blood vessels and capillaries with low Reynolds numbers where suction or injection velocity arises.
This computational model provides insights into the hemodynamics of small blood vessels and capillaries under varying flow conditions.
Offers no immediate clinical guidance; leaves open validation of biviscous models in human microvasculature.
In this paper, a pulsatile flow of a biviscous fluid in a circular tube of varying cross-section has been considered for investigation. The study helps to draw the characteristics of blood, the pressure drop and the wall shear stress on the inner wall of small blood vessels and capillaries where suction/injection velocity arises and Reynolds number is very low. The effects of Reynolds number, apparent viscosity coefficient and leakage parameter on the streamlines, pressure drop and wall shear stress have been discussed and shown graphically for suction and injection, respectively. The wall of the tube is supposed to be permeable and a normal velocity of the fluid at the wall is prescribed to consider the fluid exchange across the wall. Both analytic and numerical solutions are given. Using the perturbation technique, we analyze the problem for low Reynolds numbers and small oscillation amplitude. Lastly, the simulations are given to demonstrate the effectiveness and excellent tracking performance of the proposed control scheme.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Govindan et al. (2023) studied this question. Analytic and numerical simulations of pulsatile biviscous fluid flow demonstrated the effects of Reynolds number and viscosity on pressure drop and wall shear stress in small blood vessels.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: