Key result
Fluoxetine significantly increased the ventricular fibrillation threshold compared with the post-MI depression model group (20.20±9.32 V vs 14.67±1.85 V, P<0.05).
Why the study?
Does fluoxetine improve cardiac electrophysiology and reduce ventricular arrhythmia susceptibility in a rat model of post-MI depression?
RCT (n=80)
randomly assigned
Does fluoxetine improve cardiac electrophysiology and reduce ventricular arrhythmia susceptibility in a rat model of post-MI depression?
Absolute Event Rate: 20.2% vs 14.67%
p-value: p=<0.05
Fluoxetine reduces susceptibility to ventricular arrhythmias in a rat model of post-MI depression, potentially via upregulation of Kv4.2.
Supports preclinical testing of fluoxetine for post-MI arrhythmia reduction; leaves open clinical translation.
BACKGROUND: Major depression is diagnosed in 18% of patients following myocardial infarction (MI), and the antidepressant fluoxetine is shown to effectively decrease depressive symptoms and improve coronary heart disease prognosis. We observed the effect of fluoxetine on cardiac electrophysiology in vivo in a rat model of post-MI depression and the potential mechanism. METHODS AND RESULTS: Eighty adult male Sprague Dawley rats (200-250 g) were randomly assigned to five groups: normal control (control group), MI (MI group), depression (depression group), post-MI depression (model group), and post-MI depression treated with intragastric administration of 10 mg/kg fluoxetine (fluoxetine group). MI was induced by left anterior descending coronary artery ligation. Depression was developed by 4-week chronic mild stress (CMS). Behavior measurement was done before and during the experiment. Electrophysiology study in vivo and Western blot analysis were carried on after 4 weeks of CMS. After 4 weeks of CMS, depression-like behaviors were observed in the MI, depression, and model groups, and chronic fluoxetine administration could significantly improve those behaviors (P<0.05 vs model group). Fluoxetine significantly increased the ventricular fibrillation threshold compared with the model group (20.20±9.32 V vs 14.67±1.85 V, P<0.05). Expression of Kv4.2 was significantly reduced by 29%±12%, 24%±6%, and 41%±15%, respectively, in the MI group, CMS group, and model group, which could be improved by fluoxetine (30%±9%). But fluoxetine showed no improvement on the MI-induced loss of Cx43. CONCLUSION: The susceptibility to ventricular arrhythmias was increased in depression and post-MI depression rats, and fluoxetine may reduce the incidence of ventricular arrhythmia in post-MI depression rats and thus improve the prognosis. This may be related in part to the upregulation of Kv4.2 by fluoxetine.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Liang et al. (2015) conducted an RCT in post-MI depression (n=80). Fluoxetine vs. model group (post-MI depression) was evaluated on ventricular fibrillation threshold (p=<0.05). Fluoxetine significantly increased the ventricular fibrillation threshold compared with the post-MI depression model group (20.20±9.32 V vs 14.67±1.85 V, P<0.05).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: