Key result
Reviparin and enoxaparin demonstrated equivalent efficacy for the prevention of venographically confirmed DVT after total hip replacement (12% vs 10%, respectively).
Why the study?
Does reviparin prevent venographically confirmed DVT as effectively as enoxaparin in patients undergoing total hip replacement?
Population
498 patients undergoing elective total hip replacement
Comparison
Reviparin 4200 IU anti-Xa given preoperatively vs Enoxaparin 40 mg given preoperatively
Design
RCT, Randomly assigned, Double-blind, double-dummy
Authors
Loading...
Supports interchangeable use of either agent for DVT prophylaxis after total hip replacement; confirms LMWH equivalence in RCT evidence.
RCT (n=498)
Double-blind, double-dummy
randomly assigned
Does reviparin prevent venographically confirmed DVT as effectively as enoxaparin in patients undergoing total hip replacement?
Absolute Event Rate: 12% vs 10%
Reviparin and enoxaparin demonstrate equivalent efficacy and safety for the prevention of deep vein thrombosis after elective total hip replacement.
s et al. (1998) conducted an RCT in Total hip replacement (n=498). Reviparin vs. Enoxaparin (40mg) was evaluated on Venographically confirmed deep vein thrombosis (DVT). Reviparin and enoxaparin demonstrated equivalent efficacy for the prevention of venographically confirmed DVT after total hip replacement (12% vs 10%, respectively).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: