Key result
In adults with repaired aortic coarctation, the presence of a bicuspid aortic valve was associated with a significantly higher rate of cardiovascular reintervention (45.5% vs 20.0%, p=0.003).
Why the study?
Patients with repaired aortic coarctation remain at risk for late complications, and whether a coexisting bicuspid aortic valve increases cardiovascular reinterventions during follow-up was unclear.
Does the presence of a bicuspid aortic valve increase the risk of cardiovascular reinterventions in adults with previously repaired aortic coarctation?
Cohort (n=146)
No
Does the presence of a bicuspid aortic valve increase the risk of cardiovascular reinterventions in adults with previously repaired aortic coarctation?
Absolute Event Rate: 45.5% vs 20%
p-value: p=0.003
Adults with repaired aortic coarctation and a bicuspid aortic valve are more than twice as likely to require cardiovascular reintervention by early-to-mid-adult life compared to those without a bicuspid aortic valve.
May warrant closer surveillance in repaired coarctation with bicuspid valve; leaves open causal confirmation and intervention trials.
OBJECTIVE: Patients with previously repaired aortic coarctation (CoA) are at risk of developing late surgical complications. Many patients with CoA also have a bicuspid aortic valve (BAV). We sought to determine in patients with repaired CoA whether the presence of BAV is associated with more cardiovascular reinterventions during follow-up. METHODS: Adults with previously repaired simple CoA were recruited from our Adult Congenital Heart Disease database (Sydney, Australia). The incidence of complications relating to the 'CoA-site' (descending aortic aneurysm or dissection, or recoarctation) and the 'AV/AscAo' (aortic valve or ascending aortic pathology) that required intervention was compared between those with BAV ('CoA-BAV') and without BAV ('CoA-only'). RESULTS: Of 146 patients with repaired CoA, 101 (69%) had BAV. Age at CoA repair was similar (median 6.0 (IQR 0.5-14.0) years vs 5.0 (IQR 0.5-11.0) years, p=0.44), as was the distribution of repair types, with end-to-end repair the most common in both groups (45.9% vs 45.6%). At a median of 28 years following initial repair, a significantly higher proportion of patients with CoA-BAV required cardiovascular reintervention (45.5% vs 20.0%, p=0.003). Whereas 'CoA-site' complications were more common than 'AV/AscAo' complications in patients with CoA only (13.3% and 0%, respectively), patients with CoA-BAV had a high prevalence of both 'CoA-site' as well as 'AV/AscAo' complications (19.8% and 21.8%, respectively). Overall survival was similar (p=0.42). CONCLUSION: In adults with repaired CoA, patients with CoA-BAV are more than twice as likely to require cardiovascular reintervention by early-to-mid-adult life compared with those with CoA alone. Despite this, no difference in survival outcomes was observed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lim et al. (2021) conducted a cohort in Previously repaired aortic coarctation (n=146). Bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) vs. Without bicuspid aortic valve (CoA-only) was evaluated on Cardiovascular reintervention (p=0.003). In adults with repaired aortic coarctation, the presence of a bicuspid aortic valve was associated with a significantly higher rate of cardiovascular reintervention (45.5% vs 20.0%, p=0.003).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: