Key result
Small doses of remifentanil or sufentanil similarly blunted cardiovascular changes during tracheal intubation, with transient systolic pressure <90 mmHg occurring in 26% vs 33% of patients (P=NS).
Why the study?
Does remifentanil compared to sufentanil prevent cardiovascular changes induced by tracheal intubation in normotensive patients undergoing general anesthesia?
RCT (n=30)
Double-blind
Randomly allocated
Does remifentanil compared to sufentanil prevent cardiovascular changes induced by tracheal intubation in normotensive patients undergoing general anesthesia?
Absolute Event Rate: 26% vs 33%
p-value: p=not significant
Small doses of either remifentanil or sufentanil are similarly effective in blunting cardiovascular changes during tracheal intubation in healthy patients.
Either opioid at small doses may be used interchangeably to blunt intubation responses; confirms comparable efficacy and hypotension rates in normotensive patients.
Background and objective To compare the effects on cardiovascular changes induced by tracheal intubation when small doses of either remifentanil or sufentanil are used in the presence of midazolam. Methods Thirty normotensive, ASA physical status I–II patients, receiving general anaesthesia for major abdominal surgery, received an intravenous midazolam premedication (0.05 mg kg−1) 10 min before induction. They were randomly allocated to receive in a double-blind fashion an intravenous bolus of either (a) remifentanil given as a bolus dose 1 µg kg−1 (n = 15), or else (b) sufentanil 0.1 µg kg−1 infused over 60 s (n = 15). In each instance this loading dose was followed by a continuous intravenous infusion (0.1 µg kg−1 min−1 or 0.01 µg kg−1 min−1 of remifentanil or sufentanil, respectively). General anaesthesia was induced with propofol (2 mg kg−1), followed by atracurium besilate (0.5 mg kg−1) to facilitate tracheal intubation. Following intubation, the lungs were mechanically ventilated with a 60% nitrous oxide in oxygen mixture and a 1% inspired sevoflurane. Results Arterial pressure and heart rate were recorded before induction of anaesthesia (baseline), immediately before intubation, immediately after tracheal intubation and every minute for the first five minutes thereafter. No differences in systolic and diastolic arterial pressures were observed between the two groups. At the end of the study period, systolic and diastolic pressures slightly decreased from preinduction values in both groups. Four patients in the remifentanil group (26%) and five patients in sufentanil group (33%) showed at least one systolic pressure value < 90 mmHg during the study period (P = not significant); however, the observed decreases in systolic pressure were transient and did not require treatment. Heart rate values were not affected by tracheal intubation in either group. Conclusions In healthy normotensive patients without cardiovascular disease the use of a relatively small dose of either remifentanil or sufentanil after standard midazolam premedication results in a similar and clinically acceptable effectiveness in blunting the cardiovascular changes induced by tracheal intubation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Casati et al. (2001) conducted an RCT in Normotensive patients undergoing major abdominal surgery (n=30). Remifentanil vs. Sufentanil (0.1 µg/kg bolus followed by 0.01 µg/kg/min continuous infusion) was evaluated on At least one systolic pressure value < 90 mmHg during the study period (p=not significant). Small doses of remifentanil or sufentanil similarly blunted cardiovascular changes during tracheal intubation, with transient systolic pressure <90 mmHg occurring in 26% vs 33% of patients (P=NS).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: