Key result
Additional immunosuppressive therapy guided by left ventricular endomyocardial biopsy was associated with a non-significant trend towards achieving an ejection fraction over 35% compared to standard therapy (HR 2.85, p=0.08).
Why the study?
Recommendations for endomyocardial biopsy have significantly extended, but proposed criteria rely on expert consensus and require further clinical trials.
Does left ventricular endomyocardial biopsy-guided management improve ejection fraction in patients with unexplained heart failure?
Observational (n=30)
No
Does left ventricular endomyocardial biopsy-guided management improve ejection fraction in patients with unexplained heart failure?
Hazard Ratio: 2.85 (95% CI 0.86–9.36)
Absolute Event Rate: 66% vs 24%
p-value: p=0.08
Left ventricular endomyocardial biopsy is safe and can guide targeted immunosuppressive therapy in patients with unexplained heart failure, with a trend toward improved ejection fraction.
LV-EMB may aid unexplained HF evaluation; leaves open validation of extended criteria in prospective trials.
In recent years, the recommendations for an endomyocardial biopsy (EMB) were significantly extended. However, the proposed criteria are based on the consensus of experts and require further clinical trials. Aim: To present the results of our diagnostic and therapeutic management based on left ventricular EMB (LV-EMB) in patients with unexplained heart failure (HF). Material and methods: LV-EMBs were performed between August 2016 and March 2019. Bioptates analysis included histological, immunohistochemical and viral genome examinations. Patients meeting the inclusion criteria had additional immunosuppressive treatment. Results: LV-EMBs were performed in 30 patients. The mean SD age was 38.9 7.6 years. About 75% of patients were in NYHA class III or IV, eight were in cardiogenic shock, and four required intra-aortic balloon pump support. Fourteen patients had myocarditis and four had a viral infection. In 9 patients, steroid therapy was implemented. During the mean SD observational period of 10.5 8.1 months, all patients survived, and 11 had an ejection fraction (EF) of over 35%, of whom 6 (66%) were on additional immunosuppressive therapy and 5 (24%) on standard HF therapy (HR = 2.85; 95% CI: 0.86-9.36; p = 0.08). An increase of > 20 percentage points in the absolute EF was observed in 4 (44%) patients on steroid therapy and 3 (14%) on standard HF therapy (HR = 2.32; 95% CI: 0.51-10.39; p = 0.27). Conclusions: An LV-EMB performed by skilled physicians is a safe procedure, verifies the cardiac magnetic resonance results, and allows the use of additional therapeutic options in patients with unexplained HF.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Krajewski et al. (2019) conducted an observational in Unexplained heart failure (n=30). Additional immunosuppressive therapy vs. Standard heart failure therapy was evaluated on Ejection fraction > 35% (HR 2.85, 95% CI 0.86-9.36, p=0.08). Additional immunosuppressive therapy guided by left ventricular endomyocardial biopsy was associated with a non-significant trend towards achieving an ejection fraction over 35% compared to standard therapy (HR 2.85, p=0.08).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: