Key result
The newly designed CNUH bare metal stent demonstrated similar histopathological reactions, including percent area stenosis, compared to a commercial cobalt-chromium stent in a porcine coronary restenosis model.
Why the study?
Does the newly designed CNUH bare metal stent improve histopathological outcomes compared to a commercial bare metal stent in a porcine coronary restenosis model?
Does the newly designed CNUH bare metal stent improve histopathological outcomes compared to a commercial bare metal stent in a porcine coronary restenosis model?
The newly designed CNUH bare metal stent demonstrated similar mechanical performance and histopathological reactions compared to a commercial cobalt-chromium stent in a porcine model, suggesting its viability as a platform for future stent development.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
New CNUH stent shows comparable porcine restenosis; hypothesis-generating for future platforms, no clinical implications yet.
The aim of this study was to compare the stent designed by Chonnam National University Hospital (designated as CNUH) with commercial cobalt-chromium coronary stent in a porcine coronary overstretch restenosis model. CNUH stent was subjected to mechanical performance tests. Pigs were randomized into two groups in which the coronary arteries (10 pigs, 10 coronaries in each group) had either CNUH stent or control commercial bare metal stent. Histopathologic analysis was assessed at 28 days after stenting. In mechanical performance tests, CNUH stent showed 2.65N, 35.1N, 0.52N, 1.94%, 4.29% in the flat plate radial compression, radial force, 3 point bending, Foreshortening and recoil test, respectively. There was no significant difference in the injury score, internal elastic lamina (IEL), lumen area, neointima area, percent area stenosis, inflammation score and fibrin score between the two groups (1.2±0.35, 4.1±0.41 mm(2), 2.7±0.56 mm(2), 1.6±0.47 mm(2), 36.7±11.2%, 1.2±0.62, 0.2±0.34 in CNUH stent group vs. 1.2±0.38, 3.7±0.64 mm(2), 2.5±0.49 mm(2), 1.5±0.61 mm(2), 36.3±12.17%, 1.1±0.12, 0.4±0.46 in commercial stent group, respectively). In the mechanical performance test, CNUH stent showed the moderated performance under the guideline of FDA. CNUH stent demonstrated similar histological reactions compared with commercial cobalt-chromium stent in a porcine coronary overstretch restenosis model.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lim et al. (2013) studied Coronary overstretch restenosis (n=10). CNUH bare metal stent vs. Commercial cobalt-chromium bare metal stent (Coroflex Blue) was evaluated on Percent area stenosis at 28 days (p=0.88). The newly designed CNUH bare metal stent demonstrated similar histopathological reactions, including percent area stenosis, compared to a commercial cobalt-chromium stent in a porcine coronary restenosis model.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: