Key result
A novel two-step strategy successfully coated metallic cardiovascular stents with strongly adhering biocompatible and biodegradable aliphatic polyesters, confirmed by spectroscopy and SEM.
A novel two-step coating strategy successfully applies strongly adhering biodegradable polyester coatings to metallic stents, providing a potential anchoring layer for drug-eluting stents.
May serve as anchoring layer for drug-eluting stents; leaves open translation to clinical outcomes.
This article reports on a novel two-step strategy for the coating of cardiovascular stents by strongly adhering biocompatible and biodegradable aliphatic polyesters. First, a precoating of poly(ethylacrylate) (PEA) was electrografted onto the metallic substrate by cathodic reduction of the parent monomer in dimethylformamide (DMF). The electrodeposition of PEA, in a good solvent of it, was confirmed by both Infra-red and Raman spectroscopies. The pendant ester groups of PEA were then chemically reduced into aluminum alkoxides, able to initiate the ring-opening polymerization (ROP) of either D,L-lactide (LA) or epsilon-caprolactone (CL). Growth of biodegradable PLA or PCL coatings from the adhering precoating was confirmed by both Infra-red and Raman spectroscopies, and directly observed by scanning electron microscopy (SEM). This type of coating can act as an anchoring layer for the subsequent casting of drug-loaded polyester films allowing the controlled release of antiproliferative agents for the treatment of in-stent restenosis.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jérôme et al. (2005) studied in-stent restenosis. Two-step coating strategy with poly(ethylacrylate) and aliphatic polyesters (PLA or PCL) was evaluated on Successful coating of metallic substrate confirmed by spectroscopy and SEM. A novel two-step strategy successfully coated metallic cardiovascular stents with strongly adhering biocompatible and biodegradable aliphatic polyesters, confirmed by spectroscopy and SEM.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: