Why the study?
Does cefazolin compared to cephradine achieve different tissue and fluid concentrations in patients undergoing open-heart surgery?
Does cefazolin compared to cephradine achieve different tissue and fluid concentrations in patients undergoing open-heart surgery?
Cefazolin provides higher total tissue levels while cephradine provides higher free levels in pericardial fluid, with unclear clinical superiority for prophylaxis in open-heart surgery.
Differential penetration leaves prophylaxis choice unclear in open-heart surgery; leaves open whether total or free levels predict outcomes.
At various times before surgery, 33 patients undergoing coronary artery bypass or cardiac valve replacement surgery received a single 2.0-g dose of either cefazolin or cephradine. Simultaneous single serum, atrial appendage, and pericardial fluid samples were obtained from the patients at various times and analyzed for drug content. Compared with cephradine, cefazolin yielded higher total serum, atrial appendage, and pericardial fluid levels. Unbound (free) levels of cephradine in serum and pericardial fluid were, however, higher than those of cefazolin. It remains uncertain whether the higher and more prolonged total levels of cefazolin in the right atrial appendage and in serum, or the higher free levels of cephradine in pericardial fluid and in serum, provide either one with a therapeutic advantage.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nightingale et al. (1980) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: