Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Reveals that methyl-GBB pretreatment reduces brain long-chain acylcarnitines and infarct size in ischemic rats, suggesting enhanced mitochondrial coupling protects against stroke damage.
Long-chain acylcarnitines (LCACs) are intermediates of fatty acid oxidation and are known to exert detrimental effects on mitochondria. This study aimed to test whether lowering LCAC levels with the anti-ischemia compound 4-[ethyl(dimethyl)ammonio]butanoate (methyl-GBB) protects brain mitochondrial function and improves neurological outcomes after transient middle cerebral artery occlusion (MCAO). The effects of 14 days of pretreatment with methyl-GBB (5 mg/kg, p.o.) on brain acylcarnitine (short-, long- and medium-chain) concentrations and brain mitochondrial function were evaluated in Wistar rats. Additionally, the mitochondrial respiration and reactive oxygen species (ROS) production rates were determined using ex vivo high-resolution fluorespirometry under normal conditions, in models of ischemia-reperfusion injury (reverse electron transfer and anoxia-reoxygenation) and 24 h after MCAO. MCAO model rats underwent vibrissae-evoked forelimb-placing and limb-placing tests to assess neurological function. The infarct volume was measured on day 7 after MCAO using 2,3,5-triphenyltetrazolium chloride (TTC) staining. Treatment with methyl-GBB significantly reduced the LCAC content in brain tissue, which decreased the ROS production rate without affecting the respiration rate, indicating an increase in mitochondrial coupling. Furthermore, methyl-GBB treatment protected brain mitochondria against anoxia-reoxygenation injury. In addition, treatment with methyl-GBB significantly reduced the infarct size and improved neurological outcomes after MCAO. Increased mitochondrial coupling efficiency may be the basis for the neuroprotective effects of methyl-GBB. This study provides evidence that maintaining brain energy metabolism by lowering the levels of LCACs protects against ischemia-induced brain damage in experimental stroke models.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zvejniece et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: