Key result
Ageing marginally affected aortic hemodynamics, with the aneurysm patient and healthy volunteer showing constant dilatation rates of 0.2 and 0.1 mm/year respectively over 8-10 years.
Why the study?
Aortic dilatation rate is influenced by altered aortic hemodynamics, but the effects of ageing on aortic hemodynamics have not yet been described.
Does ageing affect aortic hemodynamics measured by 4D-flow MRI in a patient with ascending aortic aneurysm compared to a healthy volunteer?
Case Report (n=2)
Does ageing affect aortic hemodynamics measured by 4D-flow MRI in a patient with ascending aortic aneurysm compared to a healthy volunteer?
Aortic hemodynamic parameters measured by 4D-flow MRI appear to be marginally affected by ageing, suggesting that the aortic dilatation rate may remain constant as individuals age.
Aortic 4D-flow parameters appear marginally affected by ageing in this aneurysm case; hypothesis-generating for constant dilatation rate, needs confirmation.
Background It has been demonstrated that the rate of aortic dilatation is influenced by alteration of aortic hemodynamics, such as normalized flow displacement (FDN) and wall shear stress (WSS). However, the effects of ageing on aortic hemodynamics have not yet been described. Case summary 4D-Flow MRI derived aorta hemodynamics were derived in the ascending aorta of a patient with ascending aortic aneurysm (mean ± standard deviation: 46 ± 1 mm) and a healthy volunteer (aortic diameter 30 ± 1 mm) with long-term follow-up of ten and eight years, respectively. At all timepoints, compared to the healthy volunteer, the patient demonstrated higher magnitudes of FDN (7% ± 1% vs. 3% ± 1%) and WSS angle (36° ± 3° vs. 24° ± 6°), and lower WSS magnitude (565 ± 100 mPa vs. 910 ± 115 mPa), axial WSS (426 ± 71 mPa vs. 800 ± 108 mPa) and circumferential WSS (297 ± 64 mPa vs. 340 ± 85 mPa). The patient and healthy volunteer demonstrated different aortic dilatation rates (regression slope ± standard error: 0.2 ± 0.1 vs. 0.1 ± 0.2 mm per year) and trends in FDN (0.1% ± 0.1% vs. 0.1% ± 0.2% per year), WSS magnitude (22 ± 9 vs. 35 ± 13 mPa per year), axial WSS (19 ± 4 vs. 37 ± 7 mPa per year), circumferential WSS (9 ± 8 vs. 5 ± 15 mPa per year), and WSS angle (-0.5° ± 0.4° vs. -0.8° ± 1.0° per year). Discussion Aortic hemodynamic parameters are marginally affected by ageing and the aortic diameter in this case series. Since aortic hemodynamic parameters have been associated with aortic dilation by previous studies, the outcomes of the two subjects suggest that the aortic dilatation rate will remain constant while individuals are ageing and dilating.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Juffermans et al. (2023) conducted a case report in Ascending aortic aneurysm (n=2). Ageing was evaluated on Aortic dilatation rate and trends in aortic hemodynamics (normalized flow displacement and wall shear stress). Ageing marginally affected aortic hemodynamics, with the aneurysm patient and healthy volunteer showing constant dilatation rates of 0.2 and 0.1 mm/year respectively over 8-10 years.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: