Why the study?
Aortic dissection is rare but more frequent in women during pregnancy, particularly in the third trimester.
Case Report (n=1)
No
Acute aortic dissection during pregnancy requires a high index of clinical suspicion, prompt imaging, and a multidisciplinary approach to ensure maternal and fetal survival, particularly in patients with underlying connective tissue disorders like Marfan syndrome.
Case of third-trimester type B dissection managed with cesarean underscores individualized care; leaves open evidence-based guidelines.
Aortic dissection is rare and more common in men. In women, it is more frequent during pregnancy, especially in the third trimester. We present the case of a 30-year-old pregnant woman diagnosed with type B aortic dissection at 29 weeks of gestation. Following the diagnosis, fetal maturation was initiated, and the patient was transferred to a tertiary care center. Due to uncontrolled hypertension and persistent pain, and after evaluating the maternal and fetal risk-benefit, a cesarean section was performed at 29 weeks and six days. During the postoperative period, a multi-drug regimen was required for blood pressure control, but the patient recovered and was discharged. Genetic testing, prompted by a family history of sudden death (brother) and aortic dissection (father), identified a mutation in the FBN1 gene, confirming Marfan syndrome. This case highlights the importance of comprehensive patient history, the challenges of aortic dissection during pregnancy, and the need for a multidisciplinary approach in these cases.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lourenço et al. (2025) conducted a case report in Acute Aortic Dissection in Pregnancy / Marfan Syndrome (n=1). Multidisciplinary management (cesarean section and antihypertensive therapy) was evaluated on Clinical outcome (maternal and fetal survival).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: