Key result
During noninvasive positive pressure ventilation, respiratory variations in pulse pressure (ΔPP) reflected central hypovolemia, increasing by an additional 1.0% per LBNP level (95% CI 0.1-1.9; P=0.003).
Why the study?
Do respiratory variations in noninvasive pulse pressure (ΔPP), photoplethysmographic waveform amplitude (ΔPOP), or pleth variability index (PVI) reflect central hypovolemia during noninvasive positive pressure ventilation?
Do respiratory variations in noninvasive pulse pressure (ΔPP), photoplethysmographic waveform amplitude (ΔPOP), or pleth variability index (PVI) reflect central hypovolemia during noninvasive positive pressure ventilation?
Mean Difference: 1 (95% CI 0.1–1.9)
p-value: p=0.003
Respiratory variations in noninvasive pulse pressure (ΔPP) can reliably reflect central hypovolemia and assess volume status during noninvasive positive pressure ventilation.
ΔPP may track central hypovolemia during NIPPV; leaves open validation for fluid management in critically ill patients.
Background. Correct volume management is essential in patients with respiratory failure. We investigated the ability of respiratory variations in noninvasive pulse pressure (ΔPP), photoplethysmographic waveform amplitude (ΔPOP), and pleth variability index (PVI) to reflect hypovolemia during noninvasive positive pressure ventilation by inducing hypovolemia with progressive lower body negative pressure (LBNP). Methods. Fourteen volunteers underwent LBNP of 0, -20, -40, -60, and -80 mmHg for 4.5 min at each level or until presyncope. The procedure was repeated with noninvasive positive pressure ventilation. We measured stroke volume (suprasternal Doppler), ΔPP (Finapres), ΔPOP, and PVI and assessed their association with LBNP-level using linear mixed model regression analyses. Results. Stroke volume decreased with each pressure level (-11.2 mL, 95% CI -11.8, -9.6, P < 0.001), with an additional effect of noninvasive positive pressure ventilation (-3.0 mL, 95% CI -8.5, -1.3, P = 0.009). ΔPP increased for each LBNP-level (1.2%, 95% CI 0.5, 1.8, P < 0.001) and almost doubled during noninvasive positive pressure ventilation (additional increase 1.0%, 95% CI 0.1, 1.9, P = 0.003). Neither ΔPOP nor PVI was significantly associated with LBNP-level. Conclusions. During noninvasive positive pressure ventilation, preload changes were reflected by ΔPP but not by ΔPOP or PVI. This implies that ΔPP may be used to assess volume status during noninvasive positive pressure ventilation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hoff et al. (2014) studied Central hypovolemia (induced) (n=14). Noninvasive positive pressure ventilation vs. Without noninvasive positive pressure ventilation was evaluated on Respiratory variations in noninvasive pulse pressure (ΔPP) per LBNP-level (MD 1.0%, 95% CI 0.1-1.9, p=0.003). During noninvasive positive pressure ventilation, respiratory variations in pulse pressure (ΔPP) reflected central hypovolemia, increasing by an additional 1.0% per LBNP level (95% CI 0.1-1.9; P=0.003).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: