Why the study?
Does intramuscular versus intravenous administration of phylloquinone mixed micelles formulation affect pharmacokinetics and tolerance in normal human adult volunteers?
Does intramuscular versus intravenous administration of phylloquinone mixed micelles formulation affect pharmacokinetics and tolerance in normal human adult volunteers?
Intramuscular administration of phylloquinone mixed micelles is not recommended due to unpredictable absorption, whereas the intravenous route is well tolerated and effective for antagonizing coumarin-type anticoagulants.
Avoid IM phylloquinone due to unpredictable absorption; challenges assumptions of reliable IM bioavailability versus intravenous administration.
The pharmacokinetics and tolerance of phylloquinone(vitamin K1) mixed micelles formulation (Konakion MM) were evaluated, in normal human adult volunteers (n = 30) using an open randomized crossover design protocol following a 10 mg intravenous or intramuscular injection. 2. Blood samples were collected for up to 12 h after the intravenous and up to 72 h after the intramuscular injections and the phylloquinone(vitamin K1) levels determined by reversed phase h.p.l.c. with fluorometric detection after post-column electrochemical reduction. 3. Konakion MM was well tolerated after either route of administration. Pharmacokinetic analysis of plasma phylloquinone(vitamin K1) concentration vs time profiles revealed that in one-fifth of the subjects systemic availability of intramuscular phylloquinone (vitamin K1) was below 65%. 4. Our data suggest that due to sustained, but irregular and unpredictable absorption of the phylloquinone(vitamin K1) from the depot site, the intramuscular route of Konakion MM administration is not suitable and thus not recommended. 5. Konakion MM i.v. is indicated to be well tolerated and effective in antagonizing coumarin-type-anticoagulants like Marcoumar.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Soedirman et al. (1996) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: