Key result
Anderson-Fabry disease was associated with significantly lower subepicardial longitudinal strain compared to healthy controls (18.8% vs 21.4%, P<0.0001).
Why the study?
Recent speckle tracking advancements allow for the analysis of layer-specific myocardial deformation, prompting investigation of multilayer longitudinal strain in Anderson-Fabry disease patients at diagnosis.
Does layer-specific longitudinal strain analysis detect early left ventricular dysfunction in newly diagnosed, untreated Anderson-Fabry disease patients compared to healthy controls?
Case-Control (n=66)
Does layer-specific longitudinal strain analysis detect early left ventricular dysfunction in newly diagnosed, untreated Anderson-Fabry disease patients compared to healthy controls?
Layer-specific strain imaging, particularly subepicardial longitudinal strain, can identify early left ventricular longitudinal deformation impairment in newly diagnosed, untreated Anderson-Fabry disease patients.
Subepicardial strain impairment may flag early LV involvement in untreated AFD; leaves open its added diagnostic or prognostic value.
BACKGROUND: Speckle tracking advancements make now available the analysis of layer-specific myocardial deformation. This study investigated multilayer longitudinal strain in Anderson-Fabry disease (AFD) patients at diagnosis. METHODS: In a case-control study, 33 newly diagnosed, untreated AFD patients and 33 healthy age- and sex-matched healthy controls underwent a complete echocardiogram, including assessment of left ventricular (LV) transmural global longitudinal strain (GLS), subendocardial longitudinal strain (LSsubendo), subepicardial longitudinal strain (LSsubepi), and strain gradient (LSsubendo-LSsubpepi). RESULTS: Anderson-Fabry disease patients had similar blood pressure, heart rate, and ejection fraction but higher body mass index in comparison with controls. LV mass index, maximal, and relative wall thickness were significantly greater in AFD patients. LSsubendo was significantly higher than LSsubepi in both groups, but GLS (P < 0.0001), LSsubendo (P = 0.003), and particularly LSsubepi (21.4 ± 1.7 vs 18.8 ± 1.4%, P < 0.0001) were lower in AFD patients than in controls. Accordingly, LS gradient was higher in AFD patients (P = 0.003). Three patients symptomatic for dyspnoea presented a combination of LV hypertrophy and reduced LSsubepi. After adjusting for confounders by multivariate analyses, LV mass index or maximal wall thickness were independently and inversely associated with transmural GLS and LSsubepi, but not with LSsubendo in the AFD group. At receiver operating curve curves, LSsubepi best discriminated AFD and normals. CONCLUSIONS: In newly diagnosed, untreated AFD patients, layer-specific strain imaging highlights an impairment of LV longitudinal deformation, mainly involving subepicardial strain and causing increase in longitudinal strain myocardial gradient. These findings could be useful for identifying the mechanisms underlying early LV dysfunction in AFD patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Esposito et al. (2019) conducted a case-control in Anderson-Fabry disease (n=66). Anderson-Fabry disease vs. Healthy controls was evaluated on Subepicardial longitudinal strain (LSsubepi) (p=<0.0001). Anderson-Fabry disease was associated with significantly lower subepicardial longitudinal strain compared to healthy controls (18.8% vs 21.4%, P<0.0001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: