Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
BACKGROUND: Restimulation of T lymphocytes via the TCR/CD3 complex can result in CD95/CD95L-dependent activation-induced cell death (AICD). Although the correlation of AICD sensitivity to the T helper 1 phenotype was confirmed in different studies, the underlying mechanism is still debated. Thus, it has been suggested that in Th2 cells, AICD resistance is controlled by a TCR-induced upregulation of the CD95-associated inhibitory phosphatase, FAP-1. We and others demonstrated that AICD resistance is associated with a reduced surface expression of CD95L upon restimulation. METHODS: Utilizing RT-PCR, Western blotting and flow cytometry, we analyzed time-dependent changes in levels of CD95L mRNA, cytosolic protein and surface expression in five long-term human T cell clones and polarized helper populations. RESULTS: We confirm that the inducible CD95L surface expression is lower or absent in all tested AICD-resistant clones as compared to sensitive cells. It is of interest that striking differences with respect to the activation-dependent inducibility of CD95L mRNA expression in individual resistant clones were observed. In addition, alterations in the expression of the inhibitory phosphatase FAP-1 or TCR-dependent changes in CD95 sensitivity in AICD-resistant clones could be ruled out as a mechanism for AICD resistance of human T cell clones. CONCLUSIONS: (1) The data presented strongly support the previous notion that AICD resistance of human T cell clones is mainly regulated by a differential expression of CD95L. (2) Differential expression of CD95L on individual resistant clones results from a lack of mRNA induction in one set and from a markedly decreased surface expression of translated protein in another set of clones.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Janßen et al. (2000) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: