Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Machine learning study demonstrates accurate residual bolt preload prediction in hyperelastic-sealed flanges, highlighting the value of physics-informed causal graph learning.
Sequential tightening redistributes load among bolts and produces a residual preload field that depends on the complete operation history. This study presents a physics-informed graph-learning framework for a 60-bolt circular flange. The model receives initial preloads and tightening order and predicts the residual preload field on a complete causal directed graph. All 1770 admissible later-to-earlier edges are retained. Among them, 240 local edges carry non-zero Elastic Interaction Coefficient Method (EICM) attributes, while 1530 distant edges remain available to learned message passing. The multi-fidelity dataset combines online EICM responses, prescribed nonlinear-discrepancy labels, and repeated ultrasonic preload measurements. On the augmented development split, TransformerConv-L3 achieved an MAE of 138.3 N, an RMSE of 170.9 N, an NLL of 8.839, and 93.9% coverage for the nominal 95% prediction interval. Its RMSE was 56.9% lower than that of the strongest recurrent baseline evaluated under the same protocol. These results demonstrate the value of combining causal topology with mechanics-informed edge attributes for residual preload prediction.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: