Key result
CMV prophylaxis with CMVIG or antivirals was associated with significantly lower rates of graft loss and death compared to no prophylaxis at 7 years posttransplantation (P≤0.05).
Why the study?
Does CMV prophylaxis with CMVIG or antivirals reduce recipient death and graft loss in pediatric heart transplant recipients?
Cohort
Yes
Does CMV prophylaxis with CMVIG or antivirals reduce recipient death and graft loss in pediatric heart transplant recipients?
p-value: p=≤0.05
CMV prophylaxis with CMVIG or antivirals is associated with improved long-term recipient and graft survival in pediatric heart transplant recipients.
May support CMV prophylaxis in pediatric heart recipients; leaves open need for randomized confirmation.
INTRODUCTION: The association between cytomegalovirus (CMV) immune globulin (CMVIG) and clinical outcomes in pediatric heart transplantation has not been evaluated. Long-term recipient and graft survival were compared between pediatric heart recipients who received CMV prophylaxis with CMVIG (with or without antivirals), antivirals without CMVIG, and no prophylaxis. CMVIG (with or without antivirals) versus no prophylaxis was also assessed in the CMV-positive donor/CMV-negative recipient cohort. METHODS: Data from the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients included patients with a transplant date between January 1995 and October 2008; follow-up data were through March 2009. All pediatric (younger than 18 years) recipients of primary, single-organ heart transplants were included. Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to examine rates of recipient death and graft loss at 7 years posttransplantation. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to estimate adjusted risk for graft loss and death. RESULTS: CMVIG (with or without antivirals) and antivirals without CMVIG were both associated with significantly (P≤0.05) lower rates of graft loss and death versus no prophylaxis. After adjustment, CMVIG was associated with a significantly decreased adjusted risk for graft loss and a borderline (P=0.09) decreased adjusted mortality risk; antiviral prophylaxis was associated with decreased adjusted risk for graft loss and mortality. In the CMV-positive donor/CMV-negative recipient cohort, CMVIG (with or without antivirals) was associated with decreased adjusted risk for graft loss and death. CONCLUSIONS: CMV prophylaxis with CMVIG or antivirals seems to offer long-term clinical outcome benefits. Determination of optimal regimen, dosage, and duration remains to be examined.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Snydman et al. (2010) conducted a cohort in Pediatric heart transplantation. CMV immune globulin (CMVIG) with or without antivirals, or antivirals alone vs. No prophylaxis was evaluated on Recipient death and graft loss at 7 years posttransplantation (p=≤0.05). CMV prophylaxis with CMVIG or antivirals was associated with significantly lower rates of graft loss and death compared to no prophylaxis at 7 years posttransplantation (P≤0.05).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: