Key result
HFrEF was associated with higher dermal interstitial glycosaminoglycan content compared with healthy subjects.
Why the study?
Is dermal interstitial glycosaminoglycan density increased in patients with HFrEF compared to healthy subjects?
Observational (n=47)
Is dermal interstitial glycosaminoglycan density increased in patients with HFrEF compared to healthy subjects?
Interstitial glycosaminoglycan concentration is significantly increased in HFrEF patients and correlates with tissue water content and clinical signs of volume overload, suggesting a role in fluid retention.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Dermal glycosaminoglycan changes may link to edema in HFrEF; leaves open causal role and therapeutic targeting.
Background: Large networks of interstitial glycosaminoglycans help to regulate water and electrolyte homeostasis. The relation between dermal interstitial alterations and occurrence of edema in heart failure patients with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) is unknown. We hypothesize that in HFrEF patients (1) interstitial glycosaminoglycan density is increased, (2) changes in the interstitial glycosaminoglycan network are associated with interstitial fluid accumulation, and (3) there is a link between the interstitial glycosaminoglycan network and the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system. Methods and Results: Two punch biopsies of the skin were obtained in healthy subjects (n=18) and HFrEF patients (n=29). Alcian blue staining and immunostaining for the angiotensin II type 1 receptor was performed. After obtaining tissue water content, total interstitial glycosaminoglycan (uronic acid) and sulfated glycosaminoglycan were quantified. A venous blood sample, clinical examination, and echocardiography were obtained. A significantly higher interstitial glycosaminoglycan content was observed in HFrEF patients compared with healthy subjects (uronic acid: 13.0±4.2 versus 9.6±1.6 μg/mg; P =0.002; sulfated glycosaminoglycan: 14.1 [11.7; 18.1] versus 10.0 [9.1; 10.8] μg/mg; P <0.001). Uronic acid and sulfated glycosaminoglycan density were strongly associated with tissue water content and peripheral edema (uronic acid: ρ=0.66; P <0.0001 and sulfated glycosaminoglycan: τ=0.58; P <0.0001). Expression of the angiotensin II type 1 receptor was found on dermal cells, although use of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors/angiotensin receptor blocker was associated with significantly lower levels of interstitial glycosaminoglycans in HFrEF patients. Conclusions: Interstitial glycosaminoglycan concentration is significantly increased in HFrEF patients compared with healthy subjects and correlated with tissue water content and clinical signs of volume overload. A better appreciation of the interstitial compartment might improve management of volume overload in HF.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nijst et al. (2018) conducted an observational in Heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) (n=47). Heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) vs. Healthy subjects was evaluated on Interstitial glycosaminoglycan content (uronic acid) (p=0.002). HFrEF was associated with higher dermal interstitial glycosaminoglycan content compared with healthy subjects.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: