Key result
Ultrasound-guided short peripheral intravenous catheter placement was associated with a significantly higher likelihood of noncompressible veins compared to freehand insertion (P=0.0013).
Why the study?
Does ultrasound-guided short peripheral intravenous catheter placement increase the rate of venous thrombosis compared to freehand insertion in hospitalized patients?
Observational (n=135)
Single-blind
Does ultrasound-guided short peripheral intravenous catheter placement increase the rate of venous thrombosis compared to freehand insertion in hospitalized patients?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Ultrasound-guided placement of short peripheral intravenous catheters may be associated with a higher rate of early venous thrombosis compared to freehand insertion.
Approximately 90% of hospitalized patients have a short peripheral intravenous catheter (SPC) placed. Methods of inserting the catheter have evolved over time and now include the use of ultrasound (US)-guided procedures for placement. Little is known about the impact that US-guided procedures have on the vein. This study compared the rate of venous thrombosis in patients with and without US-guided catheter placement. This prospective, single-blind, observational study assessed for venous thrombosis in 153 veins from 135 patients. Veins were evaluated by a research nurse blinded to the method of placement between 48 and 72 hours after the SPC was placed. The Fisher exact test showed a significant difference between vessel compressibility and catheter insertion method (P = .0012). The proportion of noncompressible veins was significantly greater when US was used in comparison with freehand SPC insertion. The Mantel-Haenszel chi-square value of 10.34 (P = .0013) showed that US insertion technique is associated with a higher likelihood of noncompressible veins. This pilot study provides compelling evidence that the use of US to assist with catheter placement is associated with a higher rate of noncompressible veins at day 2 or 3. Further studies are needed with a larger sample to determine the generalizability of the results from this pilot study.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Curley et al. (2017) conducted an observational in Hospitalized patients requiring short peripheral intravenous catheter (n=135). Ultrasound-guided catheter placement vs. Freehand catheter placement was evaluated on Venous thrombosis (noncompressible veins) (p=.0013). Ultrasound-guided short peripheral intravenous catheter placement was associated with a significantly higher likelihood of noncompressible veins compared to freehand insertion (P=0.0013).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: