Key result
Ensemble regression using XGBoost with sensors placed on the sternum and below the left clavicle provided the most accurate pre-ejection period estimates.
Why the study?
Does specific sensor placement and XGBoost regression improve the accuracy of pre-ejection period estimation using seismocardiography?
Does specific sensor placement and XGBoost regression improve the accuracy of pre-ejection period estimation using seismocardiography?
Using XGBoost regression and optimizing sensor placement (sternum and below left clavicle) improves the accuracy of pre-ejection period estimation from seismocardiography.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Clavicle placement and ensemble regression may refine wearable PEP monitoring for HF; leaves open prospective outcome trials before clinical adoption.
Seismocardiography (SCG), the measurement of local chest vibrations due to the heart and blood movement, is a non-invasive technique to assess cardiac contractility via systolic time intervals such as the pre-ejection period (PEP). Recent studies show that SCG signals measured before and after exercise can effectively classify compensated and decompensated heart failure (HF) patients through PEP estimation. However, the morphology of the SCG signal varies from person to person and sensor placement making it difficult to automatically estimate PEP from SCG and electrocardiogram signals using a global model. In this proof-of-concept study, we address this problem by extracting a set of timing features from SCG signals measured from multiple positions on the upper body. We then test global regression models that combine all the detected features to identify the most accurate model for PEP estimation obtained from the best performing regressor and the best sensor location or combination of locations. Our results show that ensemble regression using XGBoost with a combination of sensors placed on the sternum and below the left clavicle provide the best RMSE = 11.6 ± 0.4 ms across all subjects. We also show that placing the sensor below the left or right clavicle rather than the conventional placement on the sternum results in more accurate PEP estimates.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ashouri et al. (2017) studied this question. Ensemble regression using XGBoost with sensors on sternum and below left clavicle vs. Conventional placement on the sternum was evaluated on Pre-ejection period (PEP) estimation accuracy (RMSE). Ensemble regression using XGBoost with sensors placed on the sternum and below the left clavicle provided the most accurate pre-ejection period estimates.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: