Key result
Elevated C-reactive protein (≥2) was associated with a 28% rate of acute rejection compared to 17% with CRP ≤1 (P=0.1), lacking sufficient sensitivity to replace routine endomyocardial biopsy.
Why the study?
Does C-reactive protein measurement accurately detect acute rejection compared to endomyocardial biopsy in heart transplant recipients?
Observational
Does C-reactive protein measurement accurately detect acute rejection compared to endomyocardial biopsy in heart transplant recipients?
Absolute Event Rate: 28% vs 17%
p-value: p=0.1
C-reactive protein measurement lacks sufficient sensitivity to replace routine endomyocardial biopsy for monitoring acute rejection after heart transplantation.
CRP lacks sensitivity to replace biopsy surveillance; leaves open its utility as an adjunct marker in heart transplant recipients.
Histological examination of endomyocardial biopsy (EMB) is the main technique for rejection surveillance after heart transplantation. This technique is elaborate, inconvenient for the patient, and not without complications. We prospectively analyzed whether the measurement of C-reactive protein (CRP), an acute phase protein that quickly rises when there is inflammation, can serve as a marker for immunological quiescence and as an indicator for withholding EMB. During a 6-month period, CRP was measured in all patients referred for EMB as part of the routine follow-up after heart transplantation. Acute rejection in patients with a follow-up of more than 1 year was rare (1/76). In the majority of cases, EMB was taken within the 1-year post-transplantation (170/246 = 69%). In 71/170 biopsies (42%), CRP was < or = 1; in the other 99/170 (58%), CRP was > or = 2. When CRP was < or = 1, acute rejection was diagnosed in 12/70 cases (17%). In contrast, acute rejection was found in 28/99 cases (28%) with CRP > or = 2 (P = 0.1). Although CRP is elevated more often in the presence of acute rejection, its sensitivity does not allow CRP to replace the routine performance of EMB for monitoring rejection after heart transplantation. We did, however, find a prognostic significance with regard to the effect of rejection treatment: in all acute rejections with a CRP < or = 3 (n = 11), steroids were effective.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gelder et al. (1998) conducted an observational in Heart transplantation. Elevated C-reactive protein (≥2) vs. C-reactive protein ≤1 was evaluated on Acute rejection (p=0.1). Elevated C-reactive protein (≥2) was associated with a 28% rate of acute rejection compared to 17% with CRP ≤1 (P=0.1), lacking sufficient sensitivity to replace routine endomyocardial biopsy.
Synapse has enriched 2 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: