Key result
Inpatient PCI at centers without on-site cardiac surgery had similar adjusted in-hospital mortality compared to centers with on-site surgery (OR 1.01; 95% CI 0.98-1.03; P=0.62).
Why the study?
Does inpatient PCI at centers without on-site cardiac surgery increase in-hospital mortality compared to centers with on-site cardiac surgery in patients undergoing inpatient PCI?
Population
6,912,232 patients who underwent inpatient percutaneous coronary intervention in the United States from…
Comparison
Inpatient percutaneous coronary intervention at… vs Inpatient percutaneous coronary intervention at…
Design
Cohort
Follow-up
in-hospital
Authors
Loading...
Similar adjusted mortality supports PCI without on-site surgery in unselected inpatients; leaves open need for prospective volume-outcome confirmation.
Cohort (n=6,912,232)
Yes
Does inpatient PCI at centers without on-site cardiac surgery increase in-hospital mortality compared to centers with on-site cardiac surgery in patients undergoing inpatient PCI?
Odds Ratio: 1.01 (95% CI 0.98–1.03)
Absolute Event Rate: 1.9% vs 1.4%
p-value: p=.62
Inpatient PCI at centers without on-site cardiac surgery is associated with similar adjusted in-hospital mortality compared to centers with on-site cardiac surgery, supporting its safety in the modern era.
Goel et al. (2016) conducted a cohort in Inpatient percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) (n=6,912,232). Inpatient PCI at centers without on-site cardiac surgery vs. Inpatient PCI at centers with on-site cardiac surgery was evaluated on In-hospital mortality (OR 1.01, 95% CI 0.98-1.03, p=.62). Inpatient PCI at centers without on-site cardiac surgery had similar adjusted in-hospital mortality compared to centers with on-site surgery (OR 1.01; 95% CI 0.98-1.03; P=0.62).
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: