Key result
Radiofrequency ablation successfully terminated the right ventricular outflow tract ventricular tachycardia, and the patient remained symptom-free at 1-year follow-up.
Case Report (n=1)
Radiofrequency ablation is a potentially curative and successful treatment for symptomatic repetitive right ventricular outflow tract ventricular tachycardia that begins during pregnancy and persists postpartum.
Supports considering ablation for symptomatic postpartum RVOT VT; hypothesis-generating and requires prospective confirmation.
Idiopathic ventricular tachycardias, which occur in patients without structural heart disease, are a common entity, representing up to 10% of all ventricular tachycardias evaluated by cardiac electrophysiology services. Pregnancy can increase the incidence of various cardiac arrhythmias. Factors that can potentially promote arrhythmias in pregnancy include the effects of hormones, changes in autonomic tone, hemodynamic perturbations, hypokalemia, and underlying heart disease. Ventricular arrhythmias in pregnancy are repetitive monomorphic ventricular premature complexes and couplets that frequently originate at the right ventricular outflow tract. New onset symptomatic repetitive right ventricular outflow tract ventricular tachycardia during pregnancy has been inadequately reported in the literature. We present a case of symptomatic repetitive right ventricular outflow tract tachycardia that started during pregnancy and continued in the postpartum period, requiring curative treatment with electrophysiology study and radiofrequency ablation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Goli et al. (2009) conducted a case report in Right ventricular outflow tract ventricular tachycardia (n=1). Radiofrequency ablation was evaluated on Arrhythmia termination and symptom resolution. Radiofrequency ablation successfully terminated the right ventricular outflow tract ventricular tachycardia, and the patient remained symptom-free at 1-year follow-up.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: