Key result
Resting 18F-FDG PET/CT imaging demonstrated higher sensitivity than resting myocardial perfusion imaging for identifying unstable angina.
Why the study?
Does resting myocardial 18F-FDG PET/CT imaging improve diagnostic sensitivity for unstable angina compared to resting MPI in patients with suspected unstable angina?
Observational (n=34)
Does resting myocardial 18F-FDG PET/CT imaging improve diagnostic sensitivity for unstable angina compared to resting MPI in patients with suspected unstable angina?
Resting 18F-FDG PET/CT imaging is a highly sensitive and specific technique for detecting unstable angina, outperforming resting myocardial perfusion imaging.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May support 18F-FDG PET/CT evaluation in suspected unstable angina; leaves open its role versus MPI pending prospective validation.
OBJECTIVE: Increased myocardial glucose metabolism occurs with the onset of myocardial ischemia and may persist even after the restoration of blood flow, termed as 'ischemic memory'. Previous studies have demonstrated that 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG) is a sensitive marker of myocardial ischemia and may have potential utility in diagnosing unstable angina (UA). This study aimed to explore the value of F-FDG PET/CT in diagnosing UA. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty-four patients (17 male patients; mean age, 59 ± 6 years) with suspected UA were prospectively recruited. Resting myocardial F-FDG PET/CT imaging was performed 21 ± 9 h (2-46 h) after the latest onset of angina pectoris. Resting or exercise myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) and coronary angiography were performed. 'Focal' or 'focal on diffuse' myocardial F-FDG uptake was defined as abnormal, whereas other patterns of myocardial uptake, including 'focal' uptake on the basal segments, were considered as normal. The final diagnosis of UA was based on a comprehensive analysis of ECG, MPI, and coronary angiography. RESULTS: Of the 21 patients with a final diagnosis of UA, 18 had increased 18F-FDG uptake (sensitivity 85.7%), whereas, of the 13 patients without UA, only one had abnormal 18F-FDG uptake (specificity 92.3%). The sensitivity of resting 18F-FDG imaging was higher than that of resting MPI (85.7 vs. 52.4%, P=0.016). Moreover, six UA patients with only exercise-induced ischemia showed abnormal F-FDG uptake at rest. CONCLUSION: This pilot study demonstrated that resting 18F-FDG PET/CT imaging is an accurate and sensitive technique for the identification of UA.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dou et al. (2015) conducted an observational in suspected unstable angina (n=34). Resting myocardial 18F-FDG PET/CT imaging vs. Resting myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) was evaluated on Sensitivity for identification of unstable angina (p=0.016). Resting 18F-FDG PET/CT imaging demonstrated higher sensitivity than resting myocardial perfusion imaging for identifying unstable angina.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: