Key result
Liraglutide significantly enhanced left ventricular ejection fraction (SMD -0.38; 95% CI -0.70 to -0.06; P=0.02) and cardiac index compared to placebo in patients with type 2 diabetes.
Why the study?
Liraglutide has elicited conflicting findings regarding its impact on cardiac function in patients with type 2 diabetes.
Does liraglutide improve cardiac function in patients with type 2 diabetes?
Meta-Analysis (n=220)
Double-blind
Does liraglutide improve cardiac function in patients with type 2 diabetes?
Standardized Mean Difference: -0.38 (95% CI -0.7–-0.06)
p-value: p=.02
Liraglutide may improve surrogate markers of cardiac function, such as LVEF and cardiac index, in patients with type 2 diabetes, though the current evidence is of low quality.
Liraglutide may improve select echocardiographic measures in T2D; low-quality RCT evidence leaves open need for larger trials before practice change.
BACKGROUND: Liraglutide widely utilized in type 2 diabetes treatment, has elicited conflicting findings regarding its impact on cardiac function in patients with this condition. Therefore, The objective of this study was to conduct a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to evaluate the effects of liraglutide on cardiac function in patients diagnosed with type 2 diabetes. METHODS: We identified double-blind randomized trials assessing the effects of liraglutide compared to placebo on cardiac function in patients with type 2 diabetes. Data were synthesized with the fixed-effect models to generate standard mean differences (SMDs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of each outcome for liraglutide versus placebo. The risk of bias would be assessed according to the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool, while meta-analysis would be conducted using Revman 5.3.0 software. The evidence was graded based on the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach. RESULTS: The meta-analysis encompassed 5 RCTs including 220 participants. Results revealed that liraglutide exhibited significant enhancements in left ventricular ejection fraction [SMD = -0.38, 95%CI(-0.70, -0.06), P = .02], cardiac index [SMD = -1.05, 95%CI(-1.52, -0.59), P < .0001], stroke volume [SMD = -0.67, 95%CI(-1.02, -0.32), P = .0002] and early diastolic filling velocity/late atrial filling velocity ratio [SMD = -0.52, 95%CI(-0.82, -0.22), P = .0006]. However, no statistically significant impact on cardiac output [SMD = -0.20, 95%CI(-0.53, 0.14), P = .26], early diastolic filling velocity/early diastolic annular velocity (E/Ea) ratio [SMD = -0.34, 95%CI(-0.75, 0.06), P = .10] and early diastolic filling velocity/early diastolic mitral annular velocity ratio [SMD = 0.21, 95%CI(-0.15, 0.56), P = .25] was observed. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation evidence quality ratings indicated that all the outcome measures included in this study were evaluated as having low and very low quality. CONCLUSION: The available evidence suggested that liraglutide may exert a favorable impact on cardiac function in patients with type 2 diabetes. Consequently, the utilization of liraglutide as a preventive measure against heart failure incidents in individuals with type 2 diabetes represents a promising strategy. However, robust evidence support requires the conduct of large-scale, multicenter high-quality RCTs.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Xia et al. (2024) conducted a meta-analysis in type 2 diabetes mellitus (n=220). Liraglutide vs. Placebo was evaluated on left ventricular ejection fraction (SMD -0.38, 95% CI -0.70, -0.06, p=.02). Liraglutide significantly enhanced left ventricular ejection fraction (SMD -0.38; 95% CI -0.70 to -0.06; P=0.02) and cardiac index compared to placebo in patients with type 2 diabetes.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: