Key result
Paired noninvasive testing with gene expression profiling and donor-derived cell-free DNA is increasingly challenging endomyocardial biopsy as the gold standard for heart transplant surveillance.
Why the study?
Interpretation of paired noninvasive rejection testing with gene expression profiling and donor-derived cell-free DNA can be challenging, particularly when results are discordant.
Does paired noninvasive testing (gene expression profiling and donor-derived cell-free DNA) improve rejection surveillance compared to endomyocardial biopsy in heart transplant recipients?
Does paired noninvasive testing (gene expression profiling and donor-derived cell-free DNA) improve rejection surveillance compared to endomyocardial biopsy in heart transplant recipients?
Paired noninvasive testing using gene expression profiling and donor-derived cell-free DNA is emerging as a potential new standard for rejection surveillance after heart transplantation, challenging traditional endomyocardial biopsy.
Rejection surveillance after heart transplantation has traditionally relied on numerous endomyocardial biopsies, most of which occur during the first posttransplant year. With the introduction of gene expression profiling and, more recently, donor-derived cell-free DNA, a great proportion of surveillance is being performed noninvasively with both tests. Although patients have welcomed the use of paired testing because of the decreased risk and inconvenience, interpretation of both tests can sometimes be challenging, particularly when the test results are discordant. Growing evidence from both single-center experiences and large national databases has given insights that have allowed the field to operationalize dual testing and provide physicians with algorithms to approach paired testing. The increased use of noninvasive testing has also begun to challenge the role of biopsy as the gold standard for graft monitoring, not only for rejection but over the life of the heart transplant. In a growing number of circumstances, cell-free DNA not only may be a better means of assessing rejection but could also redefine how clinicians approach the diagnosis and even treatment of graft injury. As the heart transplant community garners more experience and generates more data, the current paradigms of heart transplant surveillance will continue to be challenged.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Moayedi et al. (2024) conducted a review in Heart transplantation. Paired noninvasive testing (gene expression profiling and donor-derived cell-free DNA) vs. Endomyocardial biopsy was evaluated. Paired noninvasive testing with gene expression profiling and donor-derived cell-free DNA is increasingly challenging endomyocardial biopsy as the gold standard for heart transplant surveillance.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: