Key result
Magnetic resonance imaging remains the primary investigation tool for calf injuries in athletes due to the limitations of ultrasound, particularly when assessing the soleus muscle.
Why the study?
Calf muscle injuries involving tendinous components carry significant clinical implications for rehabilitation, return to play, and re-injury rates, requiring accurate anatomical understanding and imaging interpretation.
Does magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) improve the understanding and interpretation of calf injuries in professional athletes compared to ultrasound?
Design
Review
Authors
Loading...
May support MRI prioritization for calf injuries in athletes; leaves open prospective comparative trials.
Does magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) improve the understanding and interpretation of calf injuries in professional athletes compared to ultrasound?
MRI is the preferred imaging modality for evaluating calf injuries in athletes, especially for assessing tendinous components and the soleus muscle.
Sergot et al. (2021) conducted a review in Calf injuries. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) vs. Ultrasound was evaluated. Magnetic resonance imaging remains the primary investigation tool for calf injuries in athletes due to the limitations of ultrasound, particularly when assessing the soleus muscle.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: