Key result
A combined clinical and genetic risk score significantly improved risk stratification for late complications over a clinical score alone (C-statistic 0.95 vs 0.85; p=2x10^-16).
Why the study?
Clinical factors estimate late complication risk after the atrial switch operation for transposition of the great arteries, but heterogeneity in clinical course remains.
Does a combined genetic and clinical risk score improve risk stratification for adverse outcomes in adults after atrial switch operation for transposition of the great arteries compared to a clinical risk score alone?
Cohort (n=133)
Yes
Does a combined genetic and clinical risk score improve risk stratification for adverse outcomes in adults after atrial switch operation for transposition of the great arteries compared to a clinical risk score alone?
Adding a genetic risk score to clinical factors significantly improves risk stratification for adverse outcomes in adults with transposition of the great arteries after atrial switch operation.
May enhance risk stratification in TGA post-atrial switch; hypothesis-generating and requires prospective validation before practice change.
Background Clinical factors are used to estimate late complication risk in adults after atrial switch operation (AtrSO) for transposition of the great arteries (TGA), but heterogeneity in clinical course remains. We studied whether common genetic variants are associated with outcome and add value to a clinical risk score in TGA-AtrSO patients. Methods and results This multicenter study followed 133 TGA-AtrSO patients (aged 28 [IQR 24–35] years) for 13 (IQR 9–16) years and examined the association of genome-wide single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) with a composite endpoint of symptomatic ventricular arrhythmia, heart failure hospitalization, ventricular assist device implantation, heart transplantation, or mortality. Thirty-two patients (24%) reached the endpoint. The genome-wide association study yielded one genome-wide significant ( p < 1 × 10 −8 ) locus and 18 suggestive loci (p < 1 × 10 −5 ). A genetic risk score constructed on the basis of independent SNPs with p < 1 × 10 −5 was associated with outcome after correction for the clinical risk score (HR = 1.26/point increase [95%CI 1.17–1.35]). Risk stratification improved with a combined risk score (clinical score + genetic score) compared to the clinical score alone ( p = 2 × 10 −16 , C-statistic 0.95 vs 0.85). In 51 patients with a clinical intermediate (5–20%) 5-year risk of events, the combined score reclassified 32 patients to low (<5%) and 5 to high (>20%) risk. Stratified by the combined score, observed 5-year event-free survival was 100%, 79% and 31% for low, intermediate, and high-risk patients, respectively. Conclusions Common genetic variants may explain some variation in the clinical course in TGA-AtrSO and improve risk stratification over clinical factors alone, especially in patients at intermediate clinical risk. These findings support the hypothesis that including genetic variants in risk assessment may be beneficial.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Woudstra et al. (2022) conducted a cohort in Transposition of the great arteries after atrial switch operation (n=133). Combined clinical and genetic risk score vs. Clinical risk score alone was evaluated on Composite of symptomatic ventricular arrhythmia, heart failure hospitalization, ventricular assist device implantation, heart transplantation, or mortality (HR 1.26, 95% CI 1.17-1.35). A combined clinical and genetic risk score significantly improved risk stratification for late complications over a clinical score alone (C-statistic 0.95 vs 0.85; p=2x10^-16).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: