Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
BACKGROUND: Computed tomography venography (CTV) is clinically useful and widely available for the detection of deep vein thrombosis. Disadvantages of CTV are the need for a larger amount of i.v. contrast material (CM) and radiation exposure. A low-tube-voltage technique with iterative reconstruction may overcome this problem. The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of hybrid iterative reconstruction (HIR) on image quality at low-tube-voltage CTV. METHODS AND RESULTS: Forty patients (26 women, 14 men; mean age, 59.2±18.3 years) underwent CTV under an 80- or 120-kV protocol (CT dose index volume=10.3 mGy vs. 14.9 mGy, CM dose=540 mgI/kg vs. 690 mgI/kg) on a 64-detector CT. Quantitative parameters (ie, venous attenuation, image noise, and contrast-to-noise ratio [CNR]) were calculated and the image quality was scored on a 4-point scale. In step 1, the 80- and 120-kV protocols were compared under filtered back projection (FBP). In step 2, the 80-kV protocol with HIR was compared with the 120-kV protocol with FBP. In step 1, the visual scores were significantly higher under the 120-kV protocol; there was no significant difference in CNR between the protocols. In step 2, CNR was significantly higher under the 80-kV protocol with HIR than the 120-kV protocol with FBP. The visual scores of the 2 protocols were comparable. CONCLUSIONS: The 80-kV CTV with HIR allows for a reduction in the radiation dose by 30% and the CM dose by 20% without image quality degradation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Oda et al. (2012) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: