Key result
Anatomically fixated endografts showed similar 5-year freedom from aneurysm-related complications compared to proximal fixation endografts.
Why the study?
The study was designed to compare the outcomes of EVAR using commercially available devices in a real-world population.
Does an anatomically fixated endograft system improve freedom from aneurysm-related complications compared to endografts with proximal fixation in patients with infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysms?
RCT (n=455)
randomized
Yes
Does an anatomically fixated endograft system improve freedom from aneurysm-related complications compared to endografts with proximal fixation in patients with infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysms?
At 5 years, there was no clinically significant difference in overall aneurysm-related outcomes between anatomically fixated and proximally fixated endografts for infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysms.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
AFX and PF endografts yield comparable 5-year aneurysm-related outcomes after EVAR; leaves open optimal device selection pending larger confirmatory trials.
OBJECTIVE: The LEOPARD (Looking at EVAR Outcomes by Primary Analysis of Randomized Data) trial is a randomized controlled trial comparing the outcomes of endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) using commercially available devices in a real-world population. METHODS: A prospective, randomized, multi-center trial was performed to compare the anatomically fixated (AF) AFX/AFX2 endograft system (Endologix) with endografts with proximal fixation (PF) (Cook Medical Zenith Flex; Gore Excluder; and Medtronic Endurant II) in patients with infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysms. The primary endpoint was freedom from aneurysm-related complications (ARCs), a composite endpoint consisting of perioperative death (≤30 days), aneurysm rupture, conversion to open surgical repair, postoperative endoleaks, endograft migration (≥10 mm), aneurysm enlargement (≥5 mm), endograft limb occlusion, and device- or aneurysm-related reintervention. RESULTS: The study population was 455 patients enrolled at 56 United States centers: 235 patients were treated with AF devices and 220 with PF devices. The primary endpoint supported noninferiority of the AF cohort at 1 year. The 5-year freedom from ARC Kaplan-Meier estimates were 63.8% for AF patients and 55.5% for PF patients (P = .10). Kaplan-Meier estimates for freedom from aneurysm-related mortality were 98.7% and 97.0% in the AF group and 99.5% and 98.5% in the PF group at 1 and 5 years. There was no difference in aneurysm-related mortality, all-cause mortality, rupture, secondary interventions, and type I and type III endoleak between the two cohorts. The type III endoleak rate at 5 years for the AFX cohort was 1.5% and 0.0% for the comparator cohort (P = .11). There was a lower type II endoleak rate in the AF group at 5 years (78.8% vs 68.4%; P = .037). There were zero open surgical conversions (0.0%) in the AF group and four (2.0%) in the PF group. CONCLUSIONS: The 5-year results from the LEOPARD study demonstrated that there was no clinically significant difference in overall aneurysm-related outcomes between patients randomized to the AFX endograft system or commercially available endografts with proximal fixation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kwolek et al. (2023) conducted an RCT in infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysms (n=455). Anatomically fixated (AF) AFX/AFX2 endograft system vs. Endografts with proximal fixation (PF) was evaluated on freedom from aneurysm-related complications (ARCs) (p=.10). Anatomically fixated endografts showed similar 5-year freedom from aneurysm-related complications compared to proximal fixation endografts.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: