Key result
Impella implantation before PCI in anterior STEMI was associated with significantly higher acute CMRI-derived LVEF compared to IABP (49% vs 35%, p=0.02).
Why the study?
Late adverse myocardial remodeling after STEMI is associated with cardiac death, but the effects of Impella on CMRI parameters after STEMI are not fully understood.
Does Impella implantation before PCI improve CMRI-derived LVEF and strain parameters compared to IABP in patients with anterior STEMI?
Cohort (n=12)
Does Impella implantation before PCI improve CMRI-derived LVEF and strain parameters compared to IABP in patients with anterior STEMI?
Absolute Event Rate: 49% vs 35%
p-value: p=0.02
Impella implantation before PCI in anterior STEMI is associated with better acute and chronic left ventricular ejection fraction and strain parameters compared to IABP.
Should not yet change mechanical support practice in anterior STEMI; hypothesis-generating and requires prospective validation.
Background Late adverse myocardial remodeling after ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) is strongly associated with cardiac death. Global Longitudinal strain (GLS) and circumferential diastolic strain rate (CDSR) derived cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging (CMRI) is a powerful predictor of late myocardial remodeling. However, the Impella’s effects on CMRI after STEMI are not fully understood.Research design and methods We retrospectively compared the CMRI in the acute (18 [14–22] vs. 14 [6–22] days, p = 0.43) and chronic phases (118 [102–242] vs. 117 [101–202] days, p = 1.0) after anterior STEMI.Results Five patients received Impella before percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), and seven underwent intra-aortic balloon pumping (IABP). There were no significant differences in the peak creatine kinase levels (2595 [2069 -12,932] vs. 4372 [2941–5601] IU/L, p = 0.76) and LVEF upon admission (51 ± 11 vs. 50 ± 9%, p = 1.0). The Impella group had significantly better acute CMRI-derived LVEF (49 ± 10 vs. 35 ± 7%, p = 0.02) and CDSR (0.9 ± 0.2 vs. 0.5 ± 0.3 s− 1, p = 0.018). In the chronic phase, the CMRI-derived LVEF and GLS were significantly higher in the Impella group (54 ± 9 vs. 39 ± 5%, p = 0.01; −9.9 ± 1.3 vs. −6.5 ± 2.2%, p = 0.01).Conclusions The Impella implantation led to better LVEF and CDSR in the acute phase than IABP and better maintenance of both the LVEF and GLS through the chronic phase.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Fukamachi et al. (2025) conducted a cohort in anterior ST-elevation myocardial infarction (n=12). Impella vs. intra-aortic balloon pumping (IABP) was evaluated on acute CMRI-derived LVEF (p=0.02). Impella implantation before PCI in anterior STEMI was associated with significantly higher acute CMRI-derived LVEF compared to IABP (49% vs 35%, p=0.02).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: