Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
An investigation to determine whether stomatal acclimation to [CO 2 ] occurred in C 3 /C 4 grassland plants grown across a range of [CO 2 ] (200–550 µ mol mol −1 ) in the field was carried out. Acclimation was assessed by measuring the response of stomatal conductance ( g s ) to a range of intercellular CO 2 (a g s – C i curve) at each growth [CO 2 ] in the third and fourth growing seasons of the treatment. The g s – C i response curves for Solanum dimidiatum (C 3 perennial forb) differed significantly across [CO 2 ] treatments, suggesting that stomatal acclimation had occurred. Evidence of non–linear stomatal acclimation to [CO 2 ] in this species was also found as maximum g s ( g smax ; g s measured at the lowest C i ) increased with decreasing growth [CO 2 ] only below 400 µ mol mol −1 . The substantial increase in g s at subambient [CO 2 ] for S. dimidiatum was weakly correlated with the maximum velocity of carboxylation ( V cmax ; r 2 = 0·27) and was not associated with CO 2 saturated photosynthesis ( A max ). The response of g s to C i did not vary with growth [CO 2 ] in Bromus japonicus (C 3 annual grass) or Bothriochloa ischaemum (C 4 perennial grass), suggesting that stomatal acclimation had not occurred in these species. Stomatal density, which increased with rising [CO 2 ] in both C 3 species, was not correlated with g s . Larger stomatal size at subambient [CO 2 ], however, may be associated with stomatal acclimation in S. dimidiatum . Incorporating stomatal acclimation into modelling studies could improve the ability to predict changes in ecosystem water fluxes and water availability with rising CO 2 and to understand their magnitudes relative to the past.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Maherali et al. (2002) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: