Key result
Flow dynamics downstream of transcatheter aortic valves varied significantly by valve type, but deployment design (self-expanding vs balloon-expandable) did not influence flow dynamics.
Why the study?
Transcatheter aortic valves feature different designs that affect performance and outcomes, prompting evaluation of their flow dynamics regarding turbulence and pressure recovery.
Do self-expanding transcatheter aortic valves have different flow dynamics compared to balloon-expandable valves in an in vitro model?
Do self-expanding transcatheter aortic valves have different flow dynamics compared to balloon-expandable valves in an in vitro model?
In vitro flow dynamics of transcatheter aortic valves depend on specific valve design rather than the general deployment mechanism (self-expanding vs. balloon-expandable).
Valve-specific flow variations may inform TAVR prosthesis selection; leaves open effects on clinical outcomes.
Objective: To evaluate the flow dynamics of self-expanding and balloon-expandable transcatheter aortic valves pertaining to turbulence and pressure recovery. Transcatheter aortic valves are characterized by different designs that have different valve performance and outcomes. Methods: Assessment of transcatheter aortic valves was performed using self-expanding devices (26-mm Evolut [Medtronic], 23-mm Allegra [New Valve Technologies], and small Acurate neo [Boston Scientific]) and a balloon-expandable device (23-mm Sapien 3 [Edwards Lifesciences]). Particle image velocimetry assessed the flow downstream. A Millar catheter was used for pressure recovery calculation. Velocity, Reynolds shear stresses, viscous shear stress, and pressure gradients were calculated. Results: < .001). Leaflet oscillations with the flow were clear with the Evolut R and Acurate neo. The Allegra shows the minimal range of Reynolds shear stress magnitudes (up to 320 Pa), and Sapien 3 the maximal (up to 650 Pa). The Evolut had the smallest viscous shear stress magnitude range (up to 3.5 Pa), and the Sapien 3 the largest (up to 6.2 Pa). The largest pressure drop at the vena contracta occurred with the Acurate neo transcatheter aortic valve with a pressure gradient of 13.96 ± 1.35 mm Hg. In the recovery zone, the smallest pressure gradient was obtained with the Allegra (3.32 ± 0.94 mm Hg). Conclusions: Flow dynamics downstream of different transcatheter aortic valves vary significantly depending on the valve type, despite not having a general trend depending on whether or not valves are self-expanding or balloon-expandable. Deployment design did not have an influence on flow dynamics.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hatoum et al. (2022) studied Transcatheter aortic valves. Self-expanding transcatheter aortic valves vs. Balloon-expandable transcatheter aortic valve was evaluated on Flow dynamics (turbulence and pressure recovery). Flow dynamics downstream of transcatheter aortic valves varied significantly by valve type, but deployment design (self-expanding vs balloon-expandable) did not influence flow dynamics.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: