Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Educational tutorial demonstrates strategies for decolonizing child language curricula in speech-language therapy education, highlighting the value of culturally grounded practice.
Purpose: Speech and language therapy education has traditionally relied on Euro-American-centric theories of child development. This tutorial examines how child language acquisition curricula can be transformed through decolonization frameworks to better prepare practitioners for culturally responsive practice. Method: Drawing on critical conversations methodology and international collaborative experiences across the United Kingdom, New Zealand, and South Africa, we propose practical recommendations for curriculum transformation that center Indigenous knowledge systems, embrace multilingualism as normative, and develop critical consciousness among educators and students. The tutorial emphasizes shifting from individual deficit models toward community-based, culturally grounded approaches to understanding children's communication development. Case studies illustrate implementations of decolonized practices in university and community settings. Conclusion: This work addresses systemic inequities in speech-language therapy education and practice by providing practical guidance for curriculum transformation while acknowledging that decolonization represents an ongoing, experimental process rather than an outcome.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pillay et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: