Key result
In patients undergoing CIED implantation, obesity was associated with a significantly lower rate of major complications compared to nonobese patients (4.4% vs 8.7%; P<0.05).
Why the study?
Does obesity affect the success rate and complication rate in patients undergoing CIED implantation?
Cohort (n=965)
No
Does obesity affect the success rate and complication rate in patients undergoing CIED implantation?
CIED implantation can be safely performed in obese patients with similar success rates and paradoxically lower major complications than nonobese patients, though radiation exposure is higher.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
CIED implantation succeeds equally with fewer major complications in obese patients; cohort data leaves open protection and underscores radiation minimization.
Background Obesity is associated with increased complications and potentially worse outcomes for various cardiac interventions. This study analyzed the success rate and complication rates associated with implantation of cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) in obese patients. Hypothesis Success rates are lower and complication rates higher in obese patients. Methods Consecutive patients undergoing CIED implantation between 2011 and 2015 in our hospital were included. Patients were categorized into obese and nonobese groups according to body mass index (BMI); cutoff was 30 kg/m2. Patient characteristics, complication rates, procedural duration, and fluoroscopy data were compared between the 2 groups. Results A total of 965 patients (mean age, 69.0 ± 12.9 years; 67% male) were included. Of these, 249 (25.8%) patients were classified obese and 716 (74.2%) nonobese. Mean BMI was 34.7 ± 4.7 kg/m2 vs 25.1 ± 3.0 kg/m2, respectively. There was no difference in procedural success rates between the 2 groups (97.2% vs 97.1%, respectively). Major complications were significantly lower in the obese group compared with the nonobese group (11 [4.4%] vs 62 [8.7%]; P < 0.05). Procedural duration and fluoroscopy duration were not different between the 2 groups, but the total dose‐area product was significantly higher in obese patients vs nonobese patients (4012 ± 5416 cGcm2 vs 2692 ± 5277 cGcm2 ; P < 0.005). Conclusions CIED implantation can be safely and effectively achieved in patients with BMI >30 kg/m2. However, total radiation dose was significantly higher in the obese group, emphasizing that efforts should be made to reduce radiation exposure in these patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Attanasio et al. (2017) conducted a cohort in Cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) implantation (n=965). Obesity (BMI ≥30 kg/m2) vs. Nonobese (BMI <30 kg/m2) was evaluated on Major complications (p=<0.05). In patients undergoing CIED implantation, obesity was associated with a significantly lower rate of major complications compared to nonobese patients (4.4% vs 8.7%; P<0.05).
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: