Key result
Transcatheter aortic valve replacement had a lower 5-year cumulative incidence of infective endocarditis compared to surgical replacement (1.01% vs 1.58%; P=0.047).
Why the study?
Data comparing the frequency and outcomes of infective endocarditis after TAVR compared with SAVR were scarce.
Does TAVR using a self-expanding platform reduce the incidence of infective endocarditis compared to SAVR in patients undergoing aortic valve replacement?
Population
2249 TAVR patients and 1828 SAVR patients
Comparison
TAVR using a supra-annular, self-expanding platform vs SAVR
Design
Pooled analysis of 3 randomized clinical trials and a prospective continued access study
Follow-up
Mean 2.17±1.51 years
Authors
Loading...
TAVR with a self-expanding device is associated with a lower cumulative risk of infective endocarditis at 5 years compared to SAVR, though mortality remains high once IE occurs.
Meta-Analysis (n=4,077)
Yes
Does TAVR using a self-expanding platform reduce the incidence of infective endocarditis compared to SAVR in patients undergoing aortic valve replacement?
Absolute Event Rate: 1.01% vs 1.58%
p-value: p=0.047
TAVR with a self-expanding device is associated with a lower cumulative risk of infective endocarditis at 5 years compared to SAVR, though mortality remains high once IE occurs.
Lanz et al. (2021) conducted a meta-analysis in Aortic valve replacement (n=4,077). Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) vs. Surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) was evaluated on Cumulative incidence of infective endocarditis at 5 years (p=0.047). Transcatheter aortic valve replacement had a lower 5-year cumulative incidence of infective endocarditis compared to surgical replacement (1.01% vs 1.58%; P=0.047).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: