Key result
TAVI is linked to similar IE risk as SAVR but higher mortality if infected.
Why the study?
Data on the incidence, risk factors, and outcomes of infective endocarditis following TAVI versus surgical AVR have been conflicting.
Does TAVI compared to SAVR affect the incidence and mortality of infective endocarditis in patients with aortic stenosis?
Comparison
Percutaneous TAVI vs isolated SAVR
Design
Nationwide retrospective database cohort study
Follow-up
Median 1.2 years
Authors
Loading...
Warrants heightened vigilance for mortality if endocarditis occurs post-TAVI; extends observational data but leaves open randomized confirmation.
Cohort (n=107,806)
Yes
Does TAVI compared to SAVR affect the incidence and mortality of infective endocarditis in patients with aortic stenosis?
Relative Risk: 1.09 (95% CI 0.96–1.23)
Absolute Event Rate: 1.86% vs 1.71%
TAVI is associated with a similar risk of infective endocarditis as SAVR, but mortality is significantly higher when endocarditis occurs after TAVI.
Fauchier et al. (2020) conducted a cohort in Aortic stenosis (n=107,806). Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) vs. Isolated surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) was evaluated on Incidence of infective endocarditis (RR 1.09, 95% CI 0.96-1.23). Transcatheter aortic valve implantation was associated with a similar risk of infective endocarditis compared to surgical replacement (RR 1.09; 95% CI 0.96-1.23), but higher mortality if it occurred.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: