Key result
Induced atrial fibrillation in open-chest dogs decreased coronary blood flow from 71.6 to 54.0 ml/min per 100g and increased coronary vascular resistance compared to sinus rhythm.
Why the study?
Does induced atrial fibrillation reduce coronary blood flow and alter blood flow distribution in anesthetized open-chest dogs?
Does induced atrial fibrillation reduce coronary blood flow and alter blood flow distribution in anesthetized open-chest dogs?
Absolute Event Rate: 54% vs 71.6%
Atrial fibrillation acutely diminishes coronary flow reserve, particularly in the subendocardial layer, due to increased coronary vascular resistance.
Should not change practice; hypothesis-generating for AF effects on coronary flow in humans.
Effects of atrial fibrillation on coronary circulation and on blood flow distribution across the left ventricular wall were studied in anesthetized open-chest dogs. Atrial fibrillation was induced by pressing down mechanically the left atrial appendage or by stimulating electrically the left atrial appendage. Heated cross-thermocouples were used for measuring regional myocardial blood flow. The results showed a marked decrease in coronary blood flow with a significant increase in coronary vascular resistance; average values (SD) of flow and resistance during control simus rhythm were 71.6 +/- 7.36 ml/min . 100g heart muscle and 1.38 +/- 0.15 mmHg/ml/min . 100g heart muscle, respectively, and 54.0 +/- 13.60 ml/min . 100g and 1.54 +/- 0.18 mmHg/ml/min . 100gjust prior to cessation of atrial fibrillation. The termination of fibrillation caused a remarkable rise in coronary flow and a fall in coronary resistance. Pacing-induced tachycardia, similar to the average ventricular rate during atrial fibrillation, increased coronary blood flow and decreased coronary vascular resistance. These show that active coronary vasodilatation and an increase in extravascular support of coronary bed are produced by atrial fibrillation. Subendocardial myocardial blood flow during atrial fibrillation was reduced 22.0 +/- 14.8% from control levels followed by marked increase in flow after cessation of fibrillation, while subepicardial flow decreased only slightly. Thus, atrial fibrillation itself diminishes coronary flow reserve, especially in the subendocardial layer, partly due to the increase in myocardial component of coronary vascular resistance, and it is possible that irregular ventricular rhythm may play an important part in a rise in extravascular support.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Saito et al. (1978) studied Atrial fibrillation. Induced atrial fibrillation vs. Control sinus rhythm was evaluated on Coronary blood flow (ml/min per 100g heart muscle). Induced atrial fibrillation in open-chest dogs decreased coronary blood flow from 71.6 to 54.0 ml/min per 100g and increased coronary vascular resistance compared to sinus rhythm.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: