Why the study?
Does induced atrial fibrillation alter cardiac output and mean arterial pressure compared to sinus rhythm or atrial pacing in healthy unanesthetized dogs?
Does induced atrial fibrillation alter cardiac output and mean arterial pressure compared to sinus rhythm or atrial pacing in healthy unanesthetized dogs?
Compensatory mechanisms maintain cardiac output during atrial fibrillation at rest in healthy dogs, but these mechanisms fail during exercise, beta-blockade, or anesthesia.
May inform mechanisms of hemodynamic stability in AF; leaves open translation to patients with heart disease or during exercise.
The effects of atrial fibrillation were studied in 12 healthy unanesthetized dogs, 9 to 49 days after surgical implantation of transducers for measurement of aortic flow and left ventricular diameter. Atrial fibrillation and pacing at comparable ventricular rates were induced by electrical stimulation of the right atrial appendage, and their effects were compared with observations made during sinus rhythm in each dog. At rest, cardiac output and mean arterial pressure were not significantly different during sinus rhythm, atrial fibrillation, and atrial pacing. After beta-adrenergic blockade with propranolol, cardiac output during fibrillation was significantly less than that during pacing at comparable ventricular rates. Arterial pressure was not detectably altered. During moderately severe treadmill exercise by six dogs, cardiac output fell significantly upon induction of fibrillation. After pentobarbital anesthesia fibrillation caused decrements in cardiac output and arterial pressure that were accentuated after thoracotomy.These observations suggest the existence of compensatory mechanisms that maintain an essentially constant cardiac output when atrial fibrillation is induced in healthy unanesthetized dogs at rest. These mechanisms appear to fail during moderately severe exercise, beta-adrenergic blockade, and pentobarbital anesthesia.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Martin et al. (1967) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: