Key result
Physically fit males with Type 1 diabetes exhibited a blunted vascular repair response to acute exercise, with a 27% increase in circulating endothelial progenitor cells compared to a 139% increase in healthy controls.
Why the study?
Does acute exercise affect inflammation, vascular repair, and injury markers differently in fit males with Type 1 diabetes compared to healthy controls?
Observational (n=19)
No
Does acute exercise affect inflammation, vascular repair, and injury markers differently in fit males with Type 1 diabetes compared to healthy controls?
Absolute Event Rate: 27% vs 139%
p-value: p=0.01
Despite excellent glycemic control and high physical fitness, males with Type 1 diabetes exhibit a blunted endothelial progenitor cell (vascular repair) response to acute exercise compared to healthy controls.
Exercise effects on vascular markers in fit T1D remain hypothesis-generating; randomized trials needed before clinical adoption.
BACKGROUND: Type 1 diabetes is associated with raised inflammation, impaired endothelial progenitor cell mobilisation and increased markers of vascular injury. Both acute and chronic exercise is known to influence these markers in non-diabetic controls, but limited data exists in Type 1 diabetes. We assessed inflammation, vascular repair and injury at rest and after exercise in physically-fit males with and without Type 1 diabetes. METHODS: Ten well-controlled type 1 diabetes (27 ± 2 years; BMI 24 ± 0.7 kg.m(2); HbA1c 53.3 ± 2.4 mmol/mol) and nine non-diabetic control males (27 ± 1 years; BMI 23 ± 0.8 kg.m(2)) matched for age, BMI and fitness completed 45-min of running. Venous blood samples were collected 60-min before and 60-min after exercise, and again on the following morning. Blood samples were processed for TNF-α using ELISA, and circulating endothelial progenitor cells (cEPCs; CD45(dim)CD34(+)VEGFR2(+)) and endothelial cells (cECs; CD45(dim)CD133(-)CD34(+)CD144(+)) counts using flow-cytometry. RESULTS: TNF-α concentrations were 4-fold higher at all-time points in Type 1 diabetes, when compared with control (P < 0.001). Resting cEPCs were similar between groups; after exercise there was a significant increase in controls (P = 0.016), but not in Type 1 diabetes (P = 0.202). CEPCs peaked the morning after exercise, with a greater change in controls vs. Type 1 diabetes (+139 % vs. 27 %; P = 0.01). CECs did not change with exercise and were similar between groups at all points (P > 0.05). Within the Type 1 diabetes group, the delta change in cEPCS from rest to the following morning was related to HbA1c (r = -0.65, P = 0.021) and TNF-α (r = -0.766, P = 0.005). CONCLUSIONS: Resting cEPCs and cECs in Type 1 diabetes patients with excellent HbA1c and high physical-fitness are comparable to healthy controls, despite eliciting 4-fold greater TNF-α. Furthermore, Type 1 diabetes patients appear to have a blunted post-exercise cEPCs response (vascular repair), whilst a biomarker of vascular injury (cECs) remained comparable to healthy controls.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
West et al. (2015) conducted an observational in Type 1 diabetes (n=19). Type 1 diabetes vs. Matched non-diabetic controls was evaluated on Change in circulating endothelial progenitor cells (cEPCs) from rest to the morning after exercise (p=0.01). Physically fit males with Type 1 diabetes exhibited a blunted vascular repair response to acute exercise, with a 27% increase in circulating endothelial progenitor cells compared to a 139% increase in healthy controls.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: