Key result
Nifedipine GITS and co-amilozide resulted in similar rates of primary cardiovascular outcomes in patients with isolated systolic hypertension (6.0% vs 6.6%, not significant).
Why the study?
Does nifedipine GITS reduce cardiovascular outcomes compared to co-amilozide in patients with isolated systolic hypertension?
RCT (n=1,498)
Yes
Does nifedipine GITS reduce cardiovascular outcomes compared to co-amilozide in patients with isolated systolic hypertension?
Nifedipine GITS and co-amilozide are similarly effective in lowering blood pressure and preventing cardiovascular outcomes in patients with isolated systolic hypertension.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Nifedipine GITS offers similar cardiovascular protection to co-amilozide in isolated systolic hypertension; confirms both regimens as effective options.
AIMS: This study tested the effects on cardiovascular outcomes of treatments based on nifedipine gastrointestinal therapeutic system (GITS) compared with the diuretic combination co-amilozide in a pre-specified subset of patients with isolated systolic hypertension (ISH) enrolled in the International Nifedipine GITS Study: Intervention as a Goal in Hypertension Treatment (INSIGHT) study. MAJOR FINDINGS: Of 6321 randomized patients, 1498 (23.7%) had ISH with a baseline mean BP of 173/88 mmHg in both treatment groups. Mean BP fell by 29/10 mmHg in the nifedipine and 30/10 mmHg in the diuretic group to a mean BP of 144/78 mmHg and 143/79 mmHg, respectively, at endpoint. The percentage of primary outcomes in patients with ISH was not significantly different between the two treatment groups (nifedipine GITS 6.0%, co-amilozide 6.6%). The number of ISH patients with composite secondary outcomes was 90 (12.2%) in the nifedipine GITS group and 110 (14.5%) in the co-amilozide group (not significant). The incidence rates of primary and secondary outcomes were similar in patients without ISH. CONCLUSION: In patients with ISH, nifedipine GITS and co-amilozide had similar effects on clinical outcomes and BP lowering. They lend support to international guidelines for the treatment of hypertension recommending the use of long-acting dihydropyridine calcium-channel blockers as one treatment option for patients with ISH.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mancia et al. (2004) conducted an RCT in isolated systolic hypertension (ISH) (n=1,498). nifedipine gastrointestinal therapeutic system (GITS) vs. co-amilozide was evaluated on primary outcomes (p=not significant). Nifedipine GITS and co-amilozide resulted in similar rates of primary cardiovascular outcomes in patients with isolated systolic hypertension (6.0% vs 6.6%, not significant).
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: