Key result
Double transcatheter valve interventions using the Inovare bioprosthesis achieved 100% device success and 0% 30-day mortality in 6 high-risk patients with severe valve dysfunction.
Why the study?
Concomitant valvular heart disease carries higher morbidity and mortality during redo surgery, prompting evaluation of combined transcatheter bioprosthesis implantation.
Does combined transcatheter double valve implantation improve clinical outcomes in high-risk patients with severe valve dysfunction?
Observational (n=6)
Does combined transcatheter double valve implantation improve clinical outcomes in high-risk patients with severe valve dysfunction?
Transcatheter double valve interventions using the Inovare bioprosthesis appear to be a feasible and safe alternative to redo surgery in high-risk patients.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Supports feasibility in high-risk patients; leaves open need for larger prospective studies before wider adoption.
OBJECTIVES: Concomitant valvular heart valve disease is a frequent finding, with higher morbidity and mortality among patients undergoing redo surgical procedures. Our goal was to report our initial experience with combined transcatheter Inovare bioprosthesis implants for severe valve dysfunction. METHODS: Among 300 transcatheter procedures, a total of 6 patients had concurrent simultaneous transcatheter bioprosthesis implants for severe mitral bioprosthesis failure (valve-in-valve), with a second valve procedure that included native aortic (n = 2) or degenerated bioprostheses in the aortic position (n = 4). During the procedures, all patients were treated with a balloon-expandable Inovare transcatheter valve, using the transapical approach. RESULTS: Patients were highly symptomatic [New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class IV: 100%], with a mean age of 62 ± 5 years, yielding a mean European System for Cardiac Operative Risk II (EuroSCORE II) of 24.0 ± 10.1%. There was a mean of 1.6 ± 0.4 prior valve operations/patient, with a median time from prior mitral bioprosthesis surgery of 13.0 (9.2-20.0) years. Device success was 100% according to the Mitral Valve Academic Research Consortium and the Valve Academic Research Consortium-2 criteria. During the hospital stay, only 1 patient required dialysis, and the median intensive care unit and hospital lengths of stay were 5.0 (3.2-6.7) days and 16.0 (12.2-21.2) days, respectively. No deaths occurred at 30 days; at a median follow-up of 287 (194-437) days, 1 patient died of a non-cardiac cause and the rest of patients were in NYHA functional class I or II, with normofunctioning bioprostheses. CONCLUSIONS: Transcatheter double valve interventions using the Inovare bioprosthesis in this initial series were shown to be a reasonable alternative to redo surgical operations. The short- and mid-term clinical and echocardiographic outcomes demonstrate promising results, although future studies with a larger number of patients and longer follow-up are warranted.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Filho et al. (2020) conducted an observational in Severe valve dysfunction (mitral bioprosthesis failure and aortic valve disease) (n=6). Double transcatheter balloon-expandable valve implantation (Inovare bioprosthesis) was evaluated on Device success. Double transcatheter valve interventions using the Inovare bioprosthesis achieved 100% device success and 0% 30-day mortality in 6 high-risk patients with severe valve dysfunction.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: