Key result
High-speed rotational atherectomy (160,000-220,000 rpm) was associated with a significantly higher risk of slow flow compared to low-speed atherectomy in patients with acute coronary syndrome (OR 1.900).
Why the study?
The safety and efficacy of rotational atherectomy in ACS patients treated with different rotational speeds remain unclear.
Does high-speed rotational atherectomy compared to low-speed rotational atherectomy increase the risk of perioperative complications in ACS patients with severe coronary calcification?
Observational (n=283)
No
Does high-speed rotational atherectomy compared to low-speed rotational atherectomy increase the risk of perioperative complications in ACS patients with severe coronary calcification?
In ACS patients with severe calcification undergoing rotational atherectomy, high-speed RA increases the risk of slow flow, whereas low-speed RA increases the risk of vasospasm.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May warrant low-speed rotational atherectomy in ACS to reduce slow flow risk; leaves open optimal technique for randomized confirmation.
Background The safety and efficacy of rotational atherectomy (RA) in acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients treated with different rotational speeds remain unclear.Methods This was an observational retrospective registry. Between February 2017 and January 2022, a total of 283 ACS patients were treated with RA. The patients were divided into two groups: the low-speed group (130,000-150,000rpm,182 cases) and the high-speed group (160,000-220,000rpm,101 cases) according to the maximum RA speed. The primary outcome was the occurrence of hypotension, vasospasm, dissection, slow flow, perforation, bradyarrhythmia, burr entrapment, rotawire fracture during RA, as well as the incidence of heart failure, stent thrombosis, and cardiac death during hospitalization.Results Patients in the low-speed RA group experienced a higher incidence of vasospasm during RA operation (15.4% versus 6.9%, p = 0.040), whereas the incidence of slow blood flow was higher in the high-speed RA group (16.5% versus 27.7%, p = 0.031). There was no significant difference in other complications between the two groups. Moreover, logistic regression analysis identified rotational speed (160,000-220,000rpm) as a predictor of slow flow during RA operation (OR = 1.900, 95%CI:1.006–3.588, p = 0.048). For every 10,000 rpm increase in rotational speed, the risk of slow flow increased by 27% (OR = 1.273, 95% CI: 1.047–1.547, p = 0.015).Conclusion ACS patients treated with a lower RA speed (130,000-150,000 rpm) had a higher risk of vasospasm, while in patients where higher speeds were used (160,000-220,000 rpm ), a higher incidence of slow flow was identified. High rotational speed (160,000-220,000 rpm) is an independent risk factor for slow flow during RA in ACS patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wu et al. (2023) conducted an observational in Acute coronary syndrome with severe coronary calcification (n=283). High-speed rotational atherectomy (160,000-220,000 rpm) vs. Low-speed rotational atherectomy (130,000-150,000 rpm) was evaluated on Slow flow during rotational atherectomy (OR 1.900, 95% CI 1.006-3.588, p=0.048). High-speed rotational atherectomy (160,000-220,000 rpm) was associated with a significantly higher risk of slow flow compared to low-speed atherectomy in patients with acute coronary syndrome (OR 1.900).
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: