Key result
Excimer laser coronary atherectomy during complex PCI did not increase in-hospital MACCE but was associated with higher odds of acute complications like perforation (OR 2.18; 95% CI 1.44-3.30).
Why the study?
Previous studies evaluating the safety and utility of excimer laser coronary atherectomy (ELCA) in complex coronary lesions have been limited by small sample sizes.
Does excimer laser coronary atherectomy during complex PCI increase the risk of in-hospital MACCE or procedural complications compared to PCI without ELCA?
Cohort (n=686,358)
Yes
Does excimer laser coronary atherectomy during complex PCI increase the risk of in-hospital MACCE or procedural complications compared to PCI without ELCA?
ELCA during complex PCI is associated with increased acute procedural complications but does not increase the likelihood of in-hospital MACCE.
ELCA in complex PCI warrants caution for perforation risk; observational data leave net benefit versus standard PCI unresolved.
INTRODUCTION: Excimer laser coronary atherectomy (ELCA) is a recognized adjunctive therapy utilized in the percutaneous management of complex coronary lesions. Studies examining its safety and utility have been limited by small sample sizes. Our study examines the determinants and outcomes of ELCA. METHODS: Using the British Cardiac Intervention Society database, data were analyzed on all PCI procedures in the UK between 2006-2016. Descriptive statistics and multivariate logistic regressions were used to examine baseline, procedural and outcome associations with ELCA. RESULTS: We identified 1,471 (0.21%) ELCA cases out of 686,358 PCI procedures. Baseline covariates associated with ELCA use were age, BMI, number of lesions, CTO or restenosis attempted and history of prior MI, CABG or PCI. Procedural co-variates associated with ELCA were the use of glycoprotein inhibitors, intravascular imaging, rotational atherectomy, cutting balloons, microcatheters and intra-aortic balloon pumps. Adjusted rates of in-hospital major adverse cardiac/cerebrovascular events (MACCE) or its individual components (death, peri-procedural MI, stroke and major bleed) were not significantly altered by the use of ELCA. However, there were higher odds of dissection (OR 1.52, 95% CI 1.17-1.98), perforation (OR 2.18, 95% CI 1.44-3.30), slow flow (OR: 1.67, 95% CI 1.18-2.36), reintervention (OR: 2.12, 95% CI 1.14-3.93) and arterial complications (OR: 1.63, 95% CI 1.21-2.21). CONCLUSIONS: ELCA use during complex PCI is associated with higher risk baseline and procedural characteristics. Although increased rates of acute procedural complications were observed, ELCA does not increase likelihood of in-hospital MACCE or its individual components.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Protty et al. (2020) conducted a cohort in Complex coronary lesions undergoing PCI (n=686,358). Excimer laser coronary atherectomy (ELCA) vs. PCI without ELCA was evaluated on In-hospital major adverse cardiac/cerebrovascular events (MACCE). Excimer laser coronary atherectomy during complex PCI did not increase in-hospital MACCE but was associated with higher odds of acute complications like perforation (OR 2.18; 95% CI 1.44-3.30).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: